https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com

Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Shailesh Vara MP drops in on Addison Lee Customer Service Centre set to employ over 250 in Hampton, Peterborough

@AddisonLeeCabs 
Travel with the service that goes above and beyond.
Download the app .
For customer service enquiries


 
Our picture shows Shailesh Vara MP with Mr Andy Boland, Chief Executive, Addison Lee.
 
 
 Shailesh Vara MP recently visited the new Customer Service Centre being opened in Hampton, Peterborough, by premier London-based private hire company, Addison Lee.
Addison Lee is one of the fastest-growing companies in the UK and has been providing private hire vehicles in and around London for the last forty years.
 
Addison Lees huge fleet are all identical in appearance, and with smartly dressed drivers too! 
Recently Addison Lee has expanded operations to other cities including Cardiff, Edinburgh and Manchester, but so far not in Peterborough. 
 
The MP met with Chief Executive, Andy Boland, who explained that Peterborough’s strong economic growth and options for expansion made it the ideal place to relocate their Customer Service Centre following many years in Camden, London.
 
Addison Lee operates a fleet of over 4,000 distinctive private hire and courier vehicles
 
The company plans to employ some 250 staff which will make it one of the city’s leading employers. Anyone seeking employment at the new Hampton Customer Care Centre with Addison Lee is asked to register at www.yourjourneystartshere.co.uk 
 
Following his visit Shailesh Vara said: “It is excellent news that Addison Lee is relocating its Customer Service Centre to Peterborough and I was very pleased to visit the company’s premises. The large number of jobs that will be created by this move is a huge success for the local economy and shows that Peterborough remains one of the UK’s most attractive cities for new and expanding businesses.”


 
https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com   E&OE google.com/+JulianBray Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch alive and kicking no thanks to Cllr Harper!

An interesting comment from Cllr Chris Harper Con South Stanground is recorded below on his social media pages proving that he has a short memory, or is seeking to hide something smelly **and nasty. At a crucial time when Prime Minister Theresa May is seeking a strong election mandate to speak for Britain, it seems unfortunate that Cllr Harper still cannot be wholly truthful with his unsuspecting residents, harbouring old grudges, many residents may have recently moved here and will not know of his unfortunate history, and lack of widespread support ... 

Cllr Harper was recently caught napping (for several years) over the planning application by a Mr Hussain for a huge industrial ritual slaughterhouse for chickens soon to be housed on our doorstep with the smell wafting all over Cardea and Stanground.  

This award presented to Julian Bray
on behalf of Park Farm, however Harper still has it.

Cllr Harper professes not to know that the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch is alive and thriving and is run on social media lines through the Peterborough Tribune  (hits 722,837) Website  Possibly, as Cllr Harper ( hits 235 ...)denies many of his poorly represented residents access to his social media accounts, he thinks he can continue to pull the wool over residents eyes and trouser many thousands in councillor allowances and many thousands more for committee work ...  cushty!

What Cllr Harper does not say is that he widely trumpeted  his Neighbourhood Watch had some 500 members ( and we all believed him!), when in reality it just briefly scraped into three figures, we later had sight of the actual membership list, and as for the accounts, at one time Mr Christopher Harper had thousands in the PFNW account, but then some two years before he dumped the PFNW, the bank account was drained down to about £60 by gifting nearly £1,500 of Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch funds to the.....wait for it Peterborough City Council, where he was set to run for council!

Not for a moment are we suggesting, he corruptly purchased his seat on the council with Neighbourhood Watch funds, but when we formally asked for the Neighbourhood Watch funds back from the PCC, even quoting the PCC receipt number, answer was there none.

Cllr Harper also makes great play of his Respect award during his councillor selection process and it featured large in his election manifesto.

PRIZE PORKIES AWARD goes to C.HARPER

This is what he says:

"Awards received are Service to the Community Award from Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Government Respect Award for taking a stand against ASB and the Heart Heroes Award for Best Community"

How amazed were we to find this was an award promoted and signed by  Labours' Tony Blair, however the then plain Chris Harper had crudely altered the picture to remove any trace.  Yes we ALL were totally fooled by it!

We reproduce the certificate issued to a real neighbourhood champion Ann Edwards who was justly proud to exhibit her award.

 
Harper had crudely 'doctored' his award picture to remove any trace.   





The crudely censored RESPECT certificate and publicity banner, removing all references to Tony Blair used by Cllr Chris Harper CON South Stanground and featured in his many websites and on his party political sites.
As to 'his good works' Cllr Harper purchased Baseball Hats and tabards with STREET PATROL screen printed on them, all purchased with Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch funds. Cllr Christopher Harper still has them at his house.

What he does not have is the smelly and nasty ** attack aerosol noxious sprays he was intending to arm his STREET PATROL 'thugs' with. The Police stepped in and finally confiscated the aerosols from Christopher Harper. All this seemingly hushed up. You'll understand why we subsequently wished to have nothing to do with him.

Meanwhile The Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch has continued over the years as a wholly independent privately funded scheme, responsible for multiple evidence submissions from our supporters to police, so much so that minimotos, motorcycles have decamped from Park Farm and all but cleared off to South Stanground ie Cardea. Perhaps the South Stanground councillors should try much harder? What do you think? 

We run our Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch scheme, as far apart from the moribund county group as we could get it, but operate on agreed Home Office guidelines specially produced and written for us by the Home Office and our Member of Parliament.  Cllr Harper is well aware of this, so why is he so blinkered?

We make the point on the national website that Cllr Harper is not welcome within our scheme. That still remains the position. Cllr Harper really needs to pull his socks up, he is in our view a sorry excuse for a Conservative councillor. 

His good friend Conservative - the criminally convicted Cllr Peter Hiller - you will recall was found guilty in the courts of criminal damage, and fined heavily following a trial although he pleaded not guilty and it went to a full trial, and cost many thousands in terms of public money spent on it.

Clearly the odd couple are welcome to each other! But it does mean that you dear resident, should be aware of the truth. Sadly we are unable endorse Cllr Christopher Harper, and feel very sorry for our local MP who has to deal with him.

Amusingly we spotted Cllr Harper on the 25th April stuffing leaflets through doors in our street. For some reason he deliberately missed out our letterbox, but neighbours quickly supplied a copy. The leaflet relates to the chicken slaughter farm. simply Cllr Harper was caught napping (for several years) over the planning application by a Mr Hussain for a huge industrial ritual slaughterhouse for chickens soon to be housed on our doorstep with the smell wafting all over Cardea and Stanground.  He is now belatedly trying to claim back the credit, we didn't see his illusory teams of volunteers either... 
 
CLLR HARPER FACEBOOK FEED....
Adrian Gretton Yes Chris

     PORKIES ALERT
Councillor Chris Harper No we don't have one anymore. I gave up running ours when I became a councillor and the person who took over it ruined all the good work we had done and lost the support of the police so it was forced to close down. I have been approached to start another one up but need the volunteers to run it.
 

Peter Hiller Good to see good councillors doing their bit in the wards. Well done my friend.


https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/cardea-halal-poultery-slaughterhouse.html


https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com E&OE google.com/+JulianBray Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .

Monday, April 24, 2017

Shailesh Vara MP discovers 'the real thing' at the Woodston based Coca Cola European Partners Customer Hub...


Our picture shows Shailesh Vara MP, following the unveiling of a plaque to mark 25 years of the Woodston 'hub'
 From left to right are: An Vermeulen, Shailesh Vara MP, Ian Knibbs, Fundraising Mgr. for YMCA Cambs. & Peterborough and Sarah Breary.
 
Shailesh Vara MP visited Coca Cola European Partners Customer Hub in Woodston, Peterborough to celebrate its 25 year milestone in the city.
 
The hub opened in 1998, and expanded from 45 employees to 150 today, which makes it a significant local employer.  

Staff working at the Customer Hub provide services to more than 100,000 UK clients these include shops, restaurants and pubs stocking  Coca Cola products.
 
They also offers a Field Sales Apprenticeship Programme, last year employed 6 apprentices and planning to do the same again in 2017.
 
During his visit, Mr Vara was briefed on future plans for the Hub and met with Vice President Field Sales An Vermeulen, Sarah Breary, Associate Director of the Customer Hub and Nev Saunderson, Senior Manager for Customer Access at Coca European Partners.

Shailesh Vara and Ms Vermeulen spoke to employees both past and present,  who shared their memories and experiences.

The MP commented:  “I was very pleased to celebrate Coca-Cola’s quarter century milestone in Peterborough with both current and former employees.

"Over the years the company has grown from strength to strength and as well as supporting shops, restaurants and pubs across the U.K, the company continues to play a significant role in and around the city.

"It was a great pleasure to meet everyone and to see at first-hand how the Hub operates. I am particularly pleased about last year's successful Apprenticeship Programme and it is good to see that there will be more apprenticeships this year. I wish Coca-Cola every success in Peterborough for many more years to come.”



https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com E&OE google.com/+JulianBray Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .

SPOUSAL HACKERS ON THE INCREASE SAYS FAMILY LAWYER NICOLA MCINNES

People planning to get divorced should change their email addresses, passwords as soon as  (or before) they have separated, in order to prevent estranged spouses hacking into their account and digging out  information which could possibly be used against them. So claims lawyer Nicola McInnes, head of family law at Gorvins Solicitors. She has issued a dire warning about the rise of the so-called spousal hackers, after an increasing number of clients complained their divorcing partner (male AND female) had broken into their email accounts and social media sites such as Facebook.

Under the 1990 Computer Misuse Act, breaking into or "hacking" someone else's email account can lead to criminal charges and if proven someone could face a two year prison sentence– even if it was a prank. Yet it has increased exponentially since the inception of the internet.

“ It`s critical for anyone going through a divorce to change their email address and change all their social media passwords to stop their warring partner having access to sensitive information which could give them an advantage during divorce proceedings.”

Gorvins say they have encountered hacking spouses are particularly targeting any emails the solicitors sent which contain advice as to our client’s entitlement or because they believe their divorcing spouse is hiding income or assets.

"I had one case when we felt the husband was always a step ahead and my client was convinced that he had read emails we had exchanged. Facebook profiles are also targeted because they may contain information that can be referred to in court papers. Some clients have told me that their exes have even threatened to disclose the private photographs, they`ve found on social media accounts as a way of getting what they want.”

Almost one in five (18%) couples in the UK argue regularly or consider separating, a study suggests.

Added Nicola McInnes: “ People are understandably resistant to or resentful of being forced into changing passwords and email accounts. Unfortunately the alternative is being placed in a vulnerable position at an already distressing time.”
 

https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com E&OE google.com/+JulianBray Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .

Friday, April 21, 2017

NO JUNE GENERAL ELECTION VOTE FOR 3MILLION BRITS WHO HAVE LIVED ABROAD FOR OVER 15 YEARS ...



Up to 3 million Britons living overseas are denied a vote in the June snap general election, the Cabinet Office has confirmed.

In a letter sent to the New Europeans campaign group, the Cabinet Office said that “unfortunately” British citizens who had lived abroad  for longer than 15 years would not be entitled to vote on  June 8.

The move has prompted a furious reaction with campaign groups accusing the Conservatives of breaking yet another promise.

Nathan Lappin of the constitution group in the Cabinet Office told New Europeans that “there is no sufficient time to change the relevant primary and secondary legislation to enfranchise all British expats, scrapping the 15-year time limit, ahead of the dissolution of parliament before the general election.”

Last October the government promised to scrap the current 15-year time limit as part of a bid to strengthen ties with emigrants following the decision to leave the EU.  

> PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREELhttps://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com E&OE google.com/+JulianBray Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 .

You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

Stewart Jackson and friend

PBROTRIB Sketch: Yet again, we are about to witness the Coronation of Stewart Jackson MP, the Conservative MP for part of Peterborough, who claims he is standing again and proud to be judged on his record! HIS RECORD!!!!!!! HE MUST BE JOKING !!!!

Simply many people ( they fail to see any joke ) who are entitled to vote, just cannot be bothered, and think their single vote will not make a difference. The fact is that it will, EVERY SINGLE VOTE COUNTS INCLUDING YOUR VOTE.
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

This year, Police in Cambridgeshire are tightening up on the substantial widespread abuse of the postal vote system, and if it continues at the same rate of blatant abuse as in previous years, then expect the holding cells at Thorpe Wood Police Station to be full to bursting.

Already a number of MPs and their agents may soon be arrested over #Conservatives Battlebus and other overspending on their last election expenses.

This year, Police say the screw will be turned that much tighter. We should say Mr Stewart Jackson was not arrested, or as far as we know, not under suspicion, but if the MP and /or his election team pulls stunts such as hanging huge commercial colour advertising billboards from the offices of the local newspaper, (clearly not biased in any way although the newspaper publishers Johnson Press  carries seemingly without editorial concern his weekly polemic), then clearly a commercial rate for an outdoor advertising prime site needs to be added to his election expenses. These sites are not cheap, a few thousand a pop...  Clearly this time round we are all watching how the financial records are submitted and how the election debt stacks up - for all candidates!
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

Clearly had this been done, Mr Jackson would have in my view dramatically overspent his budget, and if the Representation of the Peoples Act electoral rules were followed to the letter, many say his election should have been reviewed and possibly re-run.  

I challenge Mr Jackson to produce the actual spend in relation to all his electioneering activities, not just the few that the former champion of failed childrens services and former Care Home owner, and Conservative Election Agent Sheila Scott included in her return.
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.


Consider that we live in a democracy but hundreds of Peterborough citizens are routinely blocked by Stewart Jackson MP from his vapid social media feeds. What sort of democracy is that?

We think Stewart Jackson, a former High Street Bank Manager, is a sorry excuse for an MP, and if the Conservative Party in London really knew of some of his antics over the last few years, they would run a mile, and order an immediate reselection putting in someone who will 100% work for this City and its citizens. Closer examination of his facebook and twitter feeds ( if you are not blocked) will underline what we mean. 
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.


Stewart will recall the time when late at night, he telephoned us and let off a stream of quite inventive invective, that would make a bishop blush.

The Conservative Party should in our view also seriously question Mr Jacksons intemperate postings over the closure of the Peterborough Childrens Centres, particularly the terse and the very strange advice he offered to worried parents, single mothers and guardians.

We should not forget some of the decidedly odd parliamentary visits he made, to exotic hot lands, during parliamentary recessions. Its all on the public record and Mr Jackson stands by it! Also as the Peterborough Soup Kitchen is now nightly feeding some 40 to 60 souls, meanwhile the MP is probably to be found fine dining in some of Peterboroughs more expensive watering holes.. 

Speaking of which we should also enquire as to how many thousands of pounds was spent by him or his cohorts on legal advice regarding his brush with the parliamentary bean counters we all hashtagged the debacle  #mpsexpenses  Its on the record, and Mr Jackson stands by it! Good Grief!
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.
 
And before Mr Jackson denies it, or telephones us again, we have it all recorded on tape, and in black and white, colour too on the Peterborough Tribune, plus loads of material sent to us, that is in the process of being independently verified, when we can be bothered to get round to it, after all this is a snap election call, and from what we hear not all conservative party members were consulted. 

Perhaps Mrs May and ex SAS man David Davis in charge of Brexit negotiations should take a closer look at Mr Jacksons record. The Conservative MP Stewart Jackson has repeatedly fallen out with the conservative controlled Peterborough City Council, but still he maintains, he is seeking yet another term and gleefully says its based on his record. Just remember it only takes one EU member to not agree our brexit proposal, just imagine if Stewart Jackson had been negotiating face to face with EU members....think back to the solar farm debacle?

Stewart Jackson stands by his record, he says,  well here it is in detail, from something we posted sometime back. A bit of an eye-opener , do open the links beside each item

How Stewart Jackson voted on Foreign Policy and Defence #
  • Consistently voted for use of UK military forces in combat operations overseas Show votes
  • Consistently voted for an investigation into the Iraq war Show votes
  • Consistently voted for replacing Trident with a new nuclear weapons system Show votes
  • Generally voted against more EU integration Show votes
  • Generally voted for a referendum on the UK's membership of the EU Show votes
  • Almost always voted against strengthening the Military Covenant Show votes
  • Generally voted against a right to remain for EU nationals already in living in the UK Show votes
  • Has never voted on UK membership of the EU
  • Consistently voted for military action against ISIL (Daesh) Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Welfare and Benefits #

  • Consistently voted for reducing housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms (which Labour describe as the "bedroom tax") Show votes
  • Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices Show votes
  • Consistently voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability Show votes
  • Almost always voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support Show votes
  • Consistently voted for a reduction in spending on welfare benefits Show votes
  • Almost always voted against spending public money to create guaranteed jobs for young people who have spent a long time unemployed Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Taxation and Employment #

  • Almost always voted for raising the threshold at which people start to pay income tax Show votes
  • Almost always voted for increasing the rate of VAT Show votes
  • Generally voted for higher taxes on alcoholic drinks Show votes
  • Almost always voted for higher taxes on plane tickets Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles Show votes
  • Generally voted against increasing the tax rate applied to income over £150,000 Show votes
  • Generally voted for encouraging occupational pensions Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against automatic enrolment in occupational pensions Show votes
  • Almost always voted against a banker’s bonus tax Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against higher taxes on banks Show votes
  • Almost always voted against an annual tax on the value of expensive homes (popularly known as a mansion tax) Show votes
  • Generally voted for allowing employees to exchange some employment rights for shares in the company they work for Show votes
  • Consistently voted for more restrictive regulation of trade union activity Show votes
  • Consistently voted for reducing capital gains tax Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Business and the Economy #

  • Almost always voted for reducing the rate of corporation tax Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against measures to reduce tax avoidance Show votes
  • Generally voted for stronger tax incentives for companies to invest in assets Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against new high speed rail infrastructure Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Health #

  • Consistently voted against restricting the provision of services to private patients by the NHS Show votes
  • Consistently voted for reforming the NHS so GPs buy services on behalf of their patients Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against smoking bans Show votes
  • Consistently voted against allowing terminally ill people to be given assistance to end their life Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Education #

  • Consistently voted for greater autonomy for schools Show votes
  • Consistently voted for raising England’s undergraduate tuition fee cap to £9,000 per year Show votes
  • Consistently voted for academy schools Show votes
  • Consistently voted for ending financial support for some 16-19 year olds in training and further education Show votes
  • Consistently voted for university tuition fees Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Constitutional Reform #

  • Almost always voted for reducing central government funding of local government Show votes
  • Consistently voted for an equal number of electors per parliamentary constituency Show votes
  • Almost always voted for fewer MPs in the House of Commons Show votes
  • Has never voted on a transparent Parliament
  • Generally voted against a more proportional system for electing MPs Show votes
  • Generally voted against a wholly elected House of Lords Show votes
  • Generally voted for local councils keeping money raised from taxes on business premises in their areas Show votes
  • Consistently voted for greater restrictions on campaigning by third parties, such as charities, during elections Show votes
  • Generally voted for fixed periods between parliamentary elections Show votes
  • Generally voted against removing hereditary peers from the House of Lords Show votes
  • Almost always voted against transferring more powers to the Welsh Assembly Show votes
  • Almost always voted against transferring more powers to the Scottish Parliament Show votes
  • Generally voted against more powers for local councils Show votes
  • Consistently voted for a veto for MPs from England, Wales and Northern Ireland over laws specifically impacting their part of the UK Show votes
  • Generally voted against a lower voting age Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Home Affairs #

  • Almost always voted for a stricter asylum system Show votes
  • Consistently voted against allowing ministers to intervene in inquests Show votes
  • Consistently voted against introducing ID cards Show votes
  • Consistently voted for the introduction of elected Police and Crime Commissioners Show votes
  • Generally voted for requiring the mass retention of information about communications Show votes
  • Consistently voted for stronger enforcement of immigration rules Show votes
  • Consistently voted for mass surveillance of people’s communications and activities Show votes
  • Consistently voted for merging police and fire services under Police and Crime Commissioners Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Environmental Issues #

  • Generally voted against measures to prevent climate change Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles Show votes
  • Consistently voted for selling England’s state owned forests Show votes
  • Almost always voted for higher taxes on plane tickets Show votes
  • Generally voted against financial incentives for low carbon emission electricity generation methods Show votes
  • Generally voted for culling badgers to tackle bovine tuberculosis Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against greater regulation of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) to extract shale gas Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against new high speed rail infrastructure Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Transport #

  • Consistently voted against greater public control of bus services Show votes
  • Almost always voted against slowing the rise in rail fares Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles Show votes
  • Almost always voted for higher taxes on plane tickets Show votes
  • Generally voted against a publicly owned railway system Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Housing #

  • Consistently voted for phasing out secure tenancies for life Show votes
  • Consistently voted for charging a market rent to high earners renting a council home Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Miscellaneous Topics #

  • Generally voted against greater regulation of gambling Show votes
  • Consistently voted for capping civil service redundancy payments Show votes
  • Generally voted against Labour's anti-terrorism laws Show votes
  • Consistently voted for the privatisation of Royal Mail Show votes
  • Generally voted against requiring pub companies to offer pub landlords rent-only leases Show votes
  • Almost always voted for restricting the scope of legal aid Show votes
  • Almost always voted for allowing national security sensitive evidence to be put before courts in secret sessions Show votes
  • Generally voted for a statutory register of lobbyists Show votes
  • Almost always voted for limits on success fees paid to lawyers in no-win no fee cases Show votes
  • Consistently voted against restrictions on fees charged to tenants by letting agents Show votes
  • Generally voted for the policies included in the 2010 Conservative - Liberal Democrat Coalition Agreement
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.



So we invite dear readers to examine that record in detail because if Mr Stewart Jackson is re-elected as MP for part of Peterborough and he remains within the UK Conservatives brexit negotiating team, his future antics could have a very long term detrimental effect on your future, and those still at our overcrowded schools, or failing cash strapped NHS, all on Mr Jacksons watch.

And before Mr Corbyn (and other candidates) jump up and down with glee, it would be a good idea for all of you to do the research on this City, especially if your are briefly visiting and possibly read your script through a few times before delivery...

But whatever your politics do use your vote - possibly tactically  -to get the right outcome and for us it would be to see a Pickfords Removals van outside the Stewart Jackson mansion ( with private swimming pool) as he moves back to an area many miles away, where he might even do some good... gentle reader you fill in the blanks... 
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Stewart+Jackson,+Jacco,+Wacco,   Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581

> PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .

P'BORO TRIB. SEARCH ENGINE

LONDON EVENING STANDARD NEWSREEL

google83466ac7cb7103b1.html]

JULIAN BRAY AVIATION SECURITY NEWS 01733 345581 UK ISDN 01733 345020


UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.


Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.


We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.




OUR HUMAN RIGHT TO LAMPOON AND CRITICISE POLITICIANS

THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

NUJ CODE OF CONDUCT

NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.


Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)