Julian Bray is delighted to have his biographical entry included in the latest edition of Debretts People of Today .... ... PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE Holding officialdom to account. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Over 3/4 of a million page hits, and 3,400 blogposts. We have over 1,680 supporters in the Stanground, Park Farm, Fletton, Cardea (South Stanground) area alone. Our reach covers the whole of the former Unitary Authority and beyond. Our amazingly resourceful supporters send through reports and pictures, over 50 minimotos / motorcycles have been taken off footpaths and the Green Wheel thanks to their unstinting efforts. The current campaign is logging vehicles totally blocking the footway and impacting on fire engine access. (We've given up on grass verge parking, as PCC isn't currently listening !!!) Make no mistake. We WILL expose and/or detect crime; highlight significantly anti-social behaviour; detect fraud, corruption or injustice; disclosing significant incompetence or negligence; protect people's health and safety; prevent people from being misled by some statement or action of an individual or organisation, In short, these elements (and other factors) help to make up what is known as the public interest and disclosing information that assists people to better comprehend or make decisions on matters of public importance. Join our conversation Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch is totally independent and not connected with the Cambridgeshire Neighbourhood Watch which at January 2018 can only show since Feb 2011 45,000 hits! whereas our hit rate (or pageview counter ) records at Jan 2018 some 750,329 page hits and has now (MAY 2018) risen to 760,132. YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

Tuesday, February 26, 2013


When Nick Clegg announced on Wednesday morning that the next caller to his weekly London based LBC radio phone-in show, "Call Clegg," was "Cathy in Dulwich" he may not have realised it was Channel 4 News presenter Cathy Newman. 

"It's Cathy Newman here from Channel 4. I'm what you might call a self-appointed detective," she told him. If Clegg was taken by surprise, he barely blinked. Newman, not surprisingly, wanted to know about the circumstances of the departure of the Lib Dems' former chief executive, Lord Rennard. 

"At the weekend you said Lord Rennard quit on health grounds. Now you appear to be accepting his behaviour was part of the reason he went," she asked.

 "LBC, Channel 4, gosh my head is spinning with the number of media outlets involved here," said Clegg.


"Anyone can ring in," replied LBC breakfast presenter Nick Ferrari, raising the spectre next week that the show might resemble a Westminster lobby Q&A. Anyway, back to Rennard. "He left on health grounds but of course the issues of his inappropriate behaviour were in the background, of course they were," said the deputy prime minister. And with that, it was time for a break. "We'd love to do an interview," added Newman. If they do, maybe Ferrari can ring in with a question. LBC radio is also on Virgin Media and Sky Platforms for us rednecks living in the sticks .

Susan: "You are faced with your own dilemma - as this was in 2008...." 

Susan, a Liberal Democrat activist, told BBC Radio 4 how she knew of nine alleged victims of sexual harassment by Lord Rennard, and health minister Norman Lamb was aware of the allegations. This is a transcript of the interview with BBC World at One.

The Lib Dems took no action against Lord Rennard, the party’s former chief executive, after first being told of the claims (Picture credit: UPPA)

A: Chris Rennard was there to talk to the women about ways that we'd been successful in gaining MPs and to impart some of his amazing knowledge on winning seats and give us the confidence that we could be successful and become MPs.

Q: Because he had a huge reputation, didn't he, of winning all those by-election successes.
A: Yes, he has an amazing skill of being able to win by-elections, to be a real strategist and he has done some amazing things for our party.

Q: So you were keen to seek his advice?
A: Well, I was, I was very flattered when he sat down and starting talking to me and started imparting some of his advice to me after we'd eaten dinner. It, it was a very fascinating conversation that we had.
Lord Rennards first floor bedroom at the top of the stairs to right of sign-To the right of the main entrance

Q: Where was this?
A: This was in the bar of the [Great Northern] hotel in Peterborough. We were all had had dinner and we sat down as group afterwards and we were, we were having a general chat. And Chris [Lord Rennard] was sat next to me. And um, he was chatting about people that we knew, people that we knew in common, and advice that he could give me as to how to be more successful.

Peter Boizots Great Northern Hotel - The 'Old Soke' Bar ground floor,  left 3 windows,  now renamed by new owners 'Sleepers'
Q: And what was it that happened then?
A: Well at first I thought it was an accident - his kind of leg brushed against me and then his hand brushed against my leg. And I kind of thought well it's not really. That's your imagination. So I moved away a little. And then he moved a little closer. And I moved away again, and the brushing of my leg kept continuing. So when someone moved off the sofa that was next to me that meant I was a chair distance away, I moved again. And when he had the opportunity he moved into that chair. So I kept moving further away. And eventually I said, 'look I'm going to go off to bed'. And he said, 'oh I'll walk up with you'. I thought no, I'm not having this, so I said, 'I'm going to go to the toilet. It's ok I'll go up to bed alone.' And I went to the toilet, came back out and he was stood there at the bottom of the stairs waiting to walk me up.

Q: What did you do then?
A: We got to the top of stairs, and he suggested joining him in his room for another drink. And I said no, very politely and very firmly and walked away and got back to room as quickly as I could.

Q: So what did you do the morning after all of this happened?
A: The morning after I was, I felt quite timid going into the training sessions. Fortunately my friend was there, and you spoke to her yesterday, and one of my first reactions was actually to pull her to one side and just tell her about it. Just so that it unburdened my own mind and just helped me to have a little bit of thinking time and gave me a real hug rather than just a virtual hug.

Q: Did you talk to your family at all?
A: I talked to my Dad immediately after the incident. I was very distressed and my Dad listened to me and calmed me down before I managed to get off to sleep that night.

Q: Obviously very distressing for you then?
A: Yes, yes I found it extremely distressing and my automatic reaction was, 'I want my daddy'.

Q: And he was able to comfort you?
A: He was, he was. He asked the questions that he would always ask as a Dad. He just wanted to make sure that I hadn't led Chris on, or that I hadn't created the situation myself and I said, 'no, no Dad, I was just sitting talking to him, just like any other person would be.'

Q: And what was your view about the whole incident?
A: I couldn't believe that first of all I'd been propositioned in the way that I had been. And that I possibly could have knocked by chances of any future success within the party by having said no.

Q: And just explain to us why you were so distressed - some people might think, well this happens - People go away on work conferences, men will try it on.
A: Of course men do try it on, but this is a man with an almighty amount of power. At the time he held the purse strings for any winnable seat and he could choose which were the starred seats - and advise other federal bodies which should be the starred seats. So this is a man who could control your future and if he said, 'oh I'm not too sure about this candidate' people listened to him and people still listen to him. Because he has commanded a great deal of respect.

Q: But there you were confident woman, county councillor, you wanted to be an MP. Jasper Gerard told me on this programme yesterday that LibDem women can stand up for themselves?
A: Well, you find LibDem women can stand up for other people and that they can very ably represent other people but when you are faced with your own dilemma - as this was in 2008 - as to what you do. It becomes really personal and you become really quite worried about how it's going to affect your chances, your future career and also how it's going to affect the party. I mean the last few days have been horrific as a party member, let alone as someone who has fallen prey to this. It has rocked the party to the core. It's been like telling the party faithful that Santa Claus isn't real. And you can't immediately stand up and go 'oh my God this has happened'. You need to think about all the consequences and most of us decided that when we did complain that we would make it informal, because we didn't want any of this fuss.

Q: And when you complained who did you decide to tell about it?
A: I told Jo Swinson and Norman Lamb and Ros Scott. The person who dealt with it in the majority was Jo Swinson who said that she would get it dealt with.

Q: Do you know how far she decided to take it?
A: I only know. I knew that he had been spoken to at the time and that this would stop and it appeared to have for a period of time immediately afterwards. But it now turns out, having heard press reports, that Danny was the person who spoke to him and he denied any knowledge of it happening even back then.

Q: Do you think Jo Swinson herself should have done more about this?
A: I think Jo did the best she could with a bad situation, because at the time, we were all saying, we don't want this to go public, we really don't want this to go public, we don't want to be in the public domain. In fact at one point, someone referred to us as 'Rennard's red hot babes'. And we didn't want the Sun or the News of the World, as it then was, headline saying that. We didn't want any of these headlines.

Q: Is that why you decided you didn't want to make a formal complaint?
A: That was why I decided not to make a formal complaint and also the fact that I didn't want to spoil my future career chances, and I wanted to continue to work within the party that I love and absolutely and totally support.

Q: So what do you think of the way that the party's handled it?
A: I think it's been a great shock to the party. I mean, it was a big enough shock to those of us it happened to. The party has struggled to deal with what is a fundamental problem within the structures of our party. And I think it's a real shame that we haven't been able to handle it better as a party.

Q: How widespread do you think this kind of behaviour was?
A: It is fairly widespread. I have spoken to nine women who were involved in this, which is a fair number. But it is always really difficult for anybody to come forward. And I'm hoping that regardless of the bad reactions that we've had from some of the men in the party, that women will come forward and will engage with the inquiries.

Q: So just to be clear, you've spoken to nine women who've had similar experiences with Lord Rennard?
A: Yes. Over various different years - I think the earliest dates back to around either 2001 or 2002 - but they have been experiences from nine women that I've spoken to.

Q: And do you know whether they made complaints as well?
A: I know many of them did and I know some of them have now come forward and engaged with the inquiry since.

Q: And do you welcome the fact that the police have now become involved in this?
A: I do. I don't know what action the police can take, but I think to try and make this as independent and fair as possible to everyone involved.

Q: Now Nick Clegg has said, he said yesterday in an interview that he wasn't told "very specific allegations". What did you make of that?
A: I made of it that he had heard the rumours as many of the party had. But I also know that many of the party had not heard rumours. I think it put him in a very difficult position and he didn't know how to deal with it and then didn't deal with it well.

Q: So do you think he should have pursued this further?
A: It's very hard in in the environment of politics to actually listen to all the rumours. I'm sure there are rumours out there about everybody who's been involved in public life. It's very hard to make that judgement call. And it's a judgement call you have to make on the spot. And on this occasion, I think he called it wrong.

Q: And in fact there was an email, wasn't there from the Daily Telegraph to Jonny Oates, a very close aide of Nick Clegg. And that did contain specific allegations. That was in April 2010.
A: Yes, and that is, is. I am unsure as to how Nick never heard of that and I would be disappointed if Jonny hadn't brought it to his attention. And from what I've heard he didn't bring it to Nick's attention. But I do think that maybe at that point someone should have said, we've got to look at this more seriously.

Q: Now, I'm sure you've seen Chris Rennard himself has issued a statement where he absolutely denies any suggestion of improper touching, "nor did I invite a woman to join me in my room" and he says, "I note these alleged instances supposedly took place in public bars with other people present"
A: Yes. I've seen that statement, and I find it actually quite hurtful. I mean, it is. I realise that he feels under enormous pressure at the moment. And he is extremely respected, and I have respect for everything he has done apart from this. He has worded it very, very carefully. But I find it, I find it really hard to having known that he invited me to his room and to having known that he approached me in the way that he approached me. That, it has happened and it is true.

Q: Do you think all of this reflects any kind of broader issue with the party? You've referred to the fact that there is an issue around the number of female Mps.

A: I think because these kinds of things happen it does put women off. And I know of people who've left the party because of this. And it, it, it would always be nice to think that we were the party on holier ground. But we're not, and every party has these problems. And I'm sure we will hear more as the weeks go on as to other issues that have happened within other parties as well. It is, it is regrettable but we have to stop this and make this a better situation for women in the future.

NEWSDESK 01733 345581 E&OE
Post a Comment




The Peterborough Tribune supports:

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) an international non-profit organisation working to defend the freedom to be informed and to inform others throughout the world.

Today, 30 years since its creation, RSF has enough experience and on-the-ground support to defend press freedom on a global scale. RSF accomplishes its work through its wide network of correspondents established in 130 countries, its 12 offices (Vienna, Brussels, Rio de Janeiro, Helsinki, Berlin, Madrid, Stockholm, Geneva, Tunis, Washington DC, London, and Paris) and its consultative status at the United Nations, UNESCO, and the Council of Europe.

As a leading defender of press freedom and freedom of information, RSF alternates public interventions and effective behind-the-scenes actions.

THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens.

We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independently resourced Neighbourhood Watch Scheme. A scheme operated following written guidelines to us directly from the Home Office.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)


Rights Holder Charter
Version: January 2009 v.3
This Rights Holder Charter (“Charter”) sets out the terms and conditions governing the relationship between Julian Bray, Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch blog entitled Peterborough Tribune (PBROTRIB) on the Blogger and other platforms, and an individual or company making a Contribution to PBROTRIB (“Rights Holder”). The purpose of this document is to ensure that the Charter terms are
incorporated into to all Contracts with each Rights Holder, so both parties areclear as to how PBROTRIB may use content. This Charter does not apply to content submitted:
· using a feature or interactive service that allows
the individual to upload to and display content on any of PBROTRIB websites
(including social sites), apps, WAP sites or any web address owned or operated
by PBROTRIB as may link to the terms accessible at
(User-Generated Content (“UGC”)); or
This Charter applies to all Rights Holder Contributions, except where the Rights Holder is already subject to a separate
written agreement with PBROTRIB in relation to Contributions, or where PBROTRIB
has agreed in writing to vary or amend the Charter due to exceptional circumstances. Formation of the Contract

By sending PBROTRIB a Contribution you are making
an offer to PBROTRIB to use the Contribution.’ PBROTRIB’s use of the
Contribution is acceptance of your offer and creates a Contract on the terms of this Charter. Submission of a Contribution by you is an acknowledgement that
you agree to the terms of this Charter. If you do not agree to the Charter you must email us as soon as possible to raise your objection and withdraw your
submitted Contribution, otherwise you will be deemed to have accepted the Charter terms.
Contract: the agreement between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution incorporating this Charter and the Special Terms (where applicable);
Contribution: material (written, audio, visual, video or audiovisual) created by the Rights Holder and will be
classified as either Material You Send Us or Material We Request From You;
Credit: for Material You Send Us “© [insert name of Rights Holder and Year]”;
Publication: means one or more publications owned or operated by PBROTRIB. Licence: the licence granted by the Rights Holder to PBROTRIB
as set out in the Licence sections of this Charter;
Personal Data: has the same meaning as provided in section 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998;
Material You Send Us: a Contribution as set out under the Material You Send Us paragraph;
Material We Request From You: A Contribution as set out under the Material We Request From You paragraph; Rights Holder: name of the of the individual or company which has created the relevant Contribution; Special Terms: written terms between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution that are not set out in this Charter and/or vary this Charter; and User-Generated Content: content submitted by an individual through a feature that allows the individual to upload material to any of PBROTRIB websites or social sites.
Conflict with other Agreements: If there is any inconsistency between any of the provisions of this Charter and the Special Terms, the Special Terms shall prevail. To be clear, where no Special Terms are agreed in writing, the Charter will apply without variation. Sending us a Contribution –
The information Rights Holders please provide To PBROTRIB When sending us a Contribution, please provide the following information:
Your Full Name;
Your Full Address; and Your Contact Telephone Number and Email Address.

We will not be able to provide Credits where a
Rights Holder has not provided the relevant information.

Material You Send Us

Material You Send Us is a Contribution that is
received by PBROTRIB from a Rights Holder. The Contribution may be solicited or unsolicited. The following are examples of Material You Send Us:
PBROTRIB has seen the Rights Holders’ photograph on a third party website. PBROTRIB contacts the
Rights Holder and asks to use the photograph. (Solicited). A Rights Holder speculatively submits a range of photographs to and for PBROTRIB’s use. The Editor may or may not decide to use one or more of the photographs. (Unsolicited) Material You Send Us does not include UGC, Material We Request You To Send Us or material that is governed under any
other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to accept any Material You Send Us for review and if accepted for review is under no obligation to offer a Contract. Should PBROTRIB decide that it wishes to use the Contribution, it will be governed by the terms of this Charter. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. If you wish to submit a speculative Contribution to us, please
contact the appropriate PBROTRIB title. Please note that PBROTRIB will not be able to acknowledge receipt of your Contribution and any submission is at the Rights Holder’s own risk.
Material You Send Us – Licence Terms
PBROTRIB believes that Material You Send Us is the
Rights Holder’s property and that the Rights Holder should not need to give up all its rights for the Contribution to be used by PBROTRIB. Therefore, by
sending us a Contribution, the Rights Holder grants the following irrevocable licence in perpetuity to PBROTRIB: The right to publish, reproduce, licence and sell the Contribution as part of the Publication throughout the world in the following formats:
-- the physical printed Publication;
-- in a replica layout in any electronic format of
the Publication;
-- on the website version of the Publication;
-- in any PBROTRIB apps delivering the Publication
to a reader; and
-- on any PBROTRIB social media pages.
-- The right to publish extracts or the whole of
the Publication (which may or may not include the Contribution) when promoting PBROTRIB’s business or subscriptions in media advertisement, show cards and other promotional aids. The Right to authorise The Newspaper Licensing Agency and similar reprographic rights organisations in other jurisdictions (“RROs”) to distribute or license the distribution of your Contribution throughout the world in any language(s) for RROs’ licensed acts and purposes as amended from time to time, and to keep available your Contribution through such RROs. The unlimited right to amend, edit, select, crop, retouch, add to or delete any part of the Contribution, in any format, whether electronic or otherwise, including the right to remove or amend any meta data associated with the Contribution.

The right to store the Contribution electronically.
In return for the licence granted in relation to the Material You Send Us, PBROTRIB will endeavour to provide the Credit with the Contribution. The licence granted to PBROTRIB shall survive any termination of the agreement between PBROTRIB and the
Rights Holder. Material We Request From You
Material We Request From You is a Contribution that
has specifically commissioned by PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB will contact a Rights Holder and
commission them to provide a Contribution in relation to a brief. An example of Material We Request From You is: PBROTRIB needs a photograph of a country building. PBROTRIB instructs the Rights Holder to attend the venue and take picture of the building. Material We Request From You does not include UGC, Material You Send Us or material that is governed under any other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB . The Rights Holder will provide its own equipment and materials to fulfil its obligation for Material We Request From You. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. Material We Request From You –
Assignment and Licence
PBROTRIB believes that Material We Request From You should be PBROTRIB ’s property as PBROTRIB has requested the Rights Holder’s services and instructed them to create the Contribution on its behalf. However, PBROTRIB acknowledges that the Right Holder may need a licence from PBROTRIB to
use the Contribution for limited purposes. Therefore, in submitting Material We Request From You to PBROTRIB , the Rights Holder assigns to PBROTRIB with full title, right and interest all existing and future intellectual property rights in the Contribution. In return, PBROTRIB will endeavour to give a Credit to the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB grants the Rights Holder a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to use the Contribution in its own online and offline portfolio, provided that the following copyright notice is applied to the Contribution “©Peterborough
Tribune, used under limited licence”.
General notes about Rights: Any rights granted to PBROTRIB or the Rights Holder under this Charter shall survive termination of the Contract for any reason. Rights Holder Promises The Rights Holder promises: that it owns the Contribution and / or is (and will continue to be) authorised to grant the rights to PBROTRIB; nothing in the Contribution is blasphemous, discriminatory, defamatory, untrue, misleading or unlawful; that the Contribution complies with the NUJ Code of Professional Conduct and the Independent
Press Standards Organisations Editors’ regulations and Code of Practice; the Contribution does not contain any virus, Trojan horse, hidden computer software or similar; the Contribution does not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party; where the Contribution contains Personal Data, all
the necessary consents in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998 have been obtained; where the Contribution contains images of children under the age of 16, written parental consent has been obtained and can be provided on request; and maintain and comply with, at all times, the highest ethical standards in the preparation, creation and delivery of the Contribution.
Complaints In the event that a complaint is raised in relation to a Contribution, the Rights Holder agrees to co-operate fully with any internal or external investigation or process. Status. The Rights Holder is an independent contractor and nothing in the Charter shall render the Rights Holder an employee, worker,
agent or partner of PBROTRIB. The Rights Holder is responsible for any taxes/national insurance payable in relation to any services provided under the Charter.
Indemnity The Rights Holder shall keep PBROTRIB indemnified in full against all loss incurred or paid by PBROTRIB as a result of or in connection with any claim made against PBROTRIB by a third party:
arising out of, or in connection with the Contribution, to the extent that such claim arises out of the breach of this or any terms of this Charter (including any Special Terms); and for actual or alleged infringement of a third party's intellectual property rights arising out of, or in connection with the use of the Contribution except in so far as the claim arises as a result of changes made by PBROTRIB or a breach of the Licence by PBROTRIB.
Variation of the Charter No variation of any term of this Charter will be effective, unless it is set out in writing (letter, fax or email) and signed by
a relevant authorised representative of PBROTRIB. If you wish to submit a Contribution and are unable to agree with the terms of this Charter or if you
have any questions regarding this Charter, please contact a relevant authorised representative of the PBROTRIB publication.
Problems & Disputes In the event of a problem or dispute in relation to a Licence and/or in connection with this Charter, in the first instance the Rights Holder and the Editor will look to resolve the dispute amicably. Application of the Charter Unless otherwise agreed, this Charter shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and English courts will have exclusive jurisdiction