https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com

Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Friday, December 13, 2013

'PORKIES' UPDATE: The Solar Farm Debate is now entwined with saving Childrens Centres Have we been here before?


Breaking News FRIDAY THE 13TH "Porkies ALERT!"

Memo to Cllr Marco Cereste and Peterborough Councillors from Cllr.  Michael Fletcher:-

Who's out in the cold?
At the last meeting of the Audit committee, members were told that the solar panels on the Freemans building had not yet produced any income whatsoever. Also, the council are contemplating taking legal action against the installing contractor.
Yesterday evening (12th Dec) at a meeting organised by BBC Radio Cambs and held at the Copeland Community Centre, Cllr: Cereste made a conflicting statement. He said, ‘the Freemans project was in fact earning money’.

Could we now be told exactly why, in the space of a few short weeks, conflicting statements have been made? Has the situation now changed or is one of those statements untruthful?


If one of those statements is proven to be untruthful, then we have a very serious situation that needs investigating.

If, either the Audit committee or the general public have been misled or in fact lied to, then action by the solicitor to the council is called for.
Regards

Cllr: Michael Fletcher.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/solarpower/10495136/Consumers-to-pay-10-per-cent-too-much-for-solar-farms-as-subsidies-too-high.html

Cllr David Seaton responds:
Thank you Cllr Fletcher

I can assure you that there have not been any conflicting statements made by officers and the Leader. At the time the Audit Committee met, the Council was still in negotiations with Ofgem on the level of tariff that the Council would receive from the Tesam site. 


The Audit Committee was told by myself (and I confirmed this at full council) that the solar panels on the roof were generating electricity but that no income had been received by the council from this. That is public information set out on the Council’s website.


At a recent meeting with Ofgem the tariff for the generation of electricity was finally agreed and therefore income from the solar panels will be paid by Ofgem to the Council in the near future and backdated to the installation of the panels. That was always going to be the case and so it is right to state that it is earning money.


I have spoken to the Director of Governance today and she has said that she is proposing to update the Audit Committee on this issue – and on a number of queries that have been raised by the Audit Committee – and will bring a public report to the Audit Committee when the matter has been finally settled. The Audit Committee, which I know you sit on and I attend as Cabinet Member for Resources, agreed this was the preferred approach.


I too have just listened with interest to the debate on the radio and was interested to hear the claim that we have been tardy in engaging with Empower. I would be happy to share with you the timetable of contacts if that would be of interest. As you know they have already reviewed our plans and confirmed they are financially robust.


The next phase we are working on is brown field, business and private housing opportunities (our social landlords are also working on social housing). However we do need to remember that unless the council owns an asset, any income (after that received by the asset owner) will go into a "community fund" and is not received directly by the council.


Kind regards


David

-------------------------------------------------------



This expensively produced video has been knocking around You-Tube for a year or so. Only 91 hits, but worth viewing as Cllr Cereste points up the council is losing funding year on year. If he knew this at the time, why has he not clamped down on the excesses of his administration?  Also spot the [hopefully deliberate] financial mistake. 

Today Friday 13th the issue of the council run mega solar farms will be decided by Peterborough City Council.  By all accounts, the BBC local radio debate on the topic was good in production terms, but hasn't really taken us any further forward.  These are some of the highlights:

Energy Firm Chairman and Council Leader Cllr Marco Cereste claims the Solar Parks will cost £250 million of borrowed public funding to make a £30 million 'profit' over the £25 year period, but still refuses to disclose how the figures were arrived at, on grounds of 'commercial confidentiality'.
As Cllr Turnip spent £1,800:00 of Stanground East community leaders funding on 'a raised vegetable bed' (hence Cllr Turnip) at an infants school where he is a school governor; you can understand why Cllr Marco Cerestes figures appear to be doubtful possibly 'off the back of a cigarette packet' even.

Cllr Cereste claims that the council will be selling 'cheap' electricity to residents. This means the setting up of a marketing and opeerations division. (They tried it before, its called Vivacity, who will be 'tapping up' the City Council for extra funding within a year or so).  You can just imagine the big energy companies taking that on the chin. Suddenly special discount loyalty packages, will appear overnight to ensure they specifically keep their existing Peterborough customer base.  Simply the only customer for Peterborough sun power will be the National Grid....

The local MP Stewart Jackson (a former Lloyds Bank High street manager) ironically points up the lack of accountability, the financial risk, impending changes in subsidy regimes, and somewhat weakly "it might be against public policy." A bit rich in view of Lloyds Bank being saddled with huge fines, lack of accountability is in there somewhere...

Farmer John Harris who is set to lose his farm if the Solar Park scheme goes ahead says it will kill off 250 acres of prime Fenland food producing land and 500 acres of Grade A food producing farmland at Newborough. Its also underlined that farmland has to be worked on, nurtured for many years in order to produce maximum food yields - it won't happen overnight; he would be driven out of business.

Cllr Nick Thurlbourn, wonders if he is a member of the city council or running a power company? He like many others has "real risk concerns" over the lack of consultation.

A Cambridge County Councillor muscled in on the discussion and says they are to look at a 50 acre solar installation, but it will be on Grade 3 land, not food producing farmland.    BBC Cambridgshire is running a 30 minute roundup tonight Friday 13th (!!!!) at 7pm.

Solar and wind farms are at the top of a list of wacky long term ideas, financed on borrowed money, at a time when the City of Peterborough cannot even afford to keep a few run down - but vital to local neighbourhoods - childrens centres open and fully operational. 

They must close say the Conservatives to save pocket money - £1.4 million, (the cost of a small 2 bed flat in the Royal Borough Kensington and Chelsea - former council leader Sir Merrick Cockell - he was dumped as Council Leader last May, and will be dumped as Chairman by the Local Government Association [LGA] next May)  The hubs idea for childrens centres, was originally spawned by spotty researchers at the LGA.

The current Conservative administration tried to do a deal with Sir Merrick, also known as Pooter (you may recall) and the Conservatives have also taken buses off the roads and generally run down essential services, or stripping them to the bone.  Much of the green wheel cycleway hasn't been maintained for months - not alongside Park Farm anyway...  But still money can be found for grandiose city centre tart ups that few want.

This is delusional, and not at all helpful.  A city centre that is virtually empty after 4pm,  and a 'for disposal' sign hanging over the 70's style shopping centre, not packed to capacity with happy shoppers. A good indicator is the number of vacant parking places displayed on the Queensgate Centre illuminated signs, all stubbornly showing three figures.  Central Milton Keynes however is 'rammed to capacity' with shoppers, and its free parking too.....

The Solar Farm project will greatly financially impact on this City for the next 25 - 35 years, long after Marco has retired to his estate in sun blessed Italy; and Marco Junior is still in the UK running for the newly formed Federation of Middle England states ( Norfolk like Scotland having opted for Independence, and allied with Norway).  

The Norfolk Coastline and the once drained Fens will by then,  have all but sunk back under the sea - we don't use a constant pumping system, the way the Dutch do, ask the Environment Agency why not?  The beach will probably by then be just a 15 minute drive from the City of Peterborough.

You can either get angry, or apply some gallows humour, we'll stick to the latter. The Environment Agency these days is sadly little more than a reactive talking shop, and does little in the way of physical flood defence work. We'll happily debate this in detail, the rot set in during Elliott Morley the disgraced MPs tenure (convicted and jailed for expenses fiddles). 

All the figures (budgets) for the PCC Solar/Wind farms are shrouded in mystery as all the details are 'commercially confidential' says Cllr Cereste. TOTAL RUBBISH! Sadly Councillor Cereste knows this, as the financial returns have been widely leaked and easy enough to reverse engineer such projects.

Other more realistic financial projections are also available.  The eyewatering budgets spent by the council producing cost models so far, are simply out of date, and at best can only be working assumptions. Its no way to run a business or a small Unitary Local Authority.

Admittedly it takes a great man with vision, to step back and say "We got this one wrong, took our collective eye off the ball, generating energy isn't after all the big deal, saving it, is now the way foward..

What isn't commercially sensitive is the fact that by the next General Election May 2015, the electricity generated by the solar/ wind farm will not be as highly profitable as Cllr Cereste and the expensively hired project planners once suggested, as Prime Minister David Cameron (already falling out with his LibDem coalition partners), in order to try and win the next General Election, is on record as "gettting rid of all this QUOTE "Green Crap."

Environmental hobby horses are being dumped, no, more correctly, some taken into general taxation. The higher rates paid to land based Solar Farm producers ARE however being slashed. Windfarms out at sea, ie offshore, will in future attract the most subsidies and tax advantages. Land based installations will not. How clear can we make this? Cllr Cereste is chairman of a solar energy company, Lark Energy Limited, he must know this?  Mind you the dope loving Rev. Flowers was until recently Chairman of the Co-Op Bank....

The council might also like to consider that fracking is also back on the agenda and set to cover a much wider area of the UK, including our region, according to documents released earlier last week, and now has to be considered as a serious energy alternative, to solar and wind.

Cpuncillors should also ask: Why invest now in this already dated solar technology, by taking on additional lomg term debt for this City when a few years down the line, the technology in any case will be much cheaper and no doubt not so intrusive ie window glass developed by Pilkington Glass is already being used in place of unsightly roof solar panel arrays.

The PBROTRIB is also very unhappy that Cllr Marco Cereste repeatedly applies the whip to his conservative councillors, they are 'hog tied' not allowed a free vote at the end of the debate. If he did allow a few free votes in council, we might have attracted 400 new high technology firms to this city as Milton Keynes has done during the last 12 months, and not just a few downmarket retailers, chain food operations and pop up shops. There has to be a better way.

Those wishing to read PBROTRIB back posts on the solar farm can use this link: http://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Solar


COMMENTS ARE WELCOME Click on 'No Comments' below google.com/+JulianBray 01733 345581 Police 101. Emergency 999. Crimestoppers 0800 555 111. CLICK ON RSS PANEL BELOW TO SEE ALL CURRENT NEWS BLOG LATER UPDATES > PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE NEWSREEL

P'BORO TRIB. SEARCH ENGINE

LONDON EVENING STANDARD NEWSREEL

google83466ac7cb7103b1.html]

JULIAN BRAY AVIATION SECURITY NEWS 01733 345581 UK ISDN 01733 345020


UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.


Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens.

We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independently resourced Neighbourhood Watch Scheme. A scheme operated following written guidelines to us directly from the Home Office.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


OUR HUMAN RIGHT TO LAMPOON AND CRITICISE POLITICIANS

The Peterborough Tribune supports:

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) an international non-profit organisation working to defend the freedom to be informed and to inform others throughout the world.

Today, 30 years since its creation, RSF has enough experience and on-the-ground support to defend press freedom on a global scale. RSF accomplishes its work through its wide network of correspondents established in 130 countries, its 12 offices (Vienna, Brussels, Rio de Janeiro, Helsinki, Berlin, Madrid, Stockholm, Geneva, Tunis, Washington DC, London, and Paris) and its consultative status at the United Nations, UNESCO, and the Council of Europe.

As a leading defender of press freedom and freedom of information, RSF alternates public interventions and effective behind-the-scenes actions. www.rsf.org/en





THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.


Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

NUJ CODE OF CONDUCT

NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.


Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)

PBROTRIB CHARTER


Rights Holder Charter
Version: January 2009 v.3
Introduction
This Rights Holder Charter (“Charter”) sets out the terms and conditions governing the relationship between Julian Bray, Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch blog entitled Peterborough Tribune (PBROTRIB) on the Blogger and other platforms, and an individual or company making a Contribution to PBROTRIB (“Rights Holder”). The purpose of this document is to ensure that the Charter terms are
incorporated into to all Contracts with each Rights Holder, so both parties areclear as to how PBROTRIB may use content. This Charter does not apply to content submitted:
· using a feature or interactive service that allows
the individual to upload to and display content on any of PBROTRIB websites
(including social sites), apps, WAP sites or any web address owned or operated
by PBROTRIB as may link to the terms accessible at
(User-Generated Content (“UGC”)); or
·
This Charter applies to all Rights Holder Contributions, except where the Rights Holder is already subject to a separate
written agreement with PBROTRIB in relation to Contributions, or where PBROTRIB
has agreed in writing to vary or amend the Charter due to exceptional circumstances. Formation of the Contract

By sending PBROTRIB a Contribution you are making
an offer to PBROTRIB to use the Contribution.’ PBROTRIB’s use of the
Contribution is acceptance of your offer and creates a Contract on the terms of this Charter. Submission of a Contribution by you is an acknowledgement that
you agree to the terms of this Charter. If you do not agree to the Charter you must email us as soon as possible to raise your objection and withdraw your
submitted Contribution, otherwise you will be deemed to have accepted the Charter terms.
Definitions
Contract: the agreement between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution incorporating this Charter and the Special Terms (where applicable);
Contribution: material (written, audio, visual, video or audiovisual) created by the Rights Holder and will be
classified as either Material You Send Us or Material We Request From You;
Credit: for Material You Send Us “© [insert name of Rights Holder and Year]”;
Publication: means one or more publications owned or operated by PBROTRIB. Licence: the licence granted by the Rights Holder to PBROTRIB
as set out in the Licence sections of this Charter;
Personal Data: has the same meaning as provided in section 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998;
Material You Send Us: a Contribution as set out under the Material You Send Us paragraph;
Material We Request From You: A Contribution as set out under the Material We Request From You paragraph; Rights Holder: name of the of the individual or company which has created the relevant Contribution; Special Terms: written terms between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution that are not set out in this Charter and/or vary this Charter; and User-Generated Content: content submitted by an individual through a feature that allows the individual to upload material to any of PBROTRIB websites or social sites.
Conflict with other Agreements: If there is any inconsistency between any of the provisions of this Charter and the Special Terms, the Special Terms shall prevail. To be clear, where no Special Terms are agreed in writing, the Charter will apply without variation. Sending us a Contribution –
The information Rights Holders please provide To PBROTRIB When sending us a Contribution, please provide the following information:
·
Your Full Name;
Your Full Address; and Your Contact Telephone Number and Email Address.

We will not be able to provide Credits where a
Rights Holder has not provided the relevant information.

Material You Send Us

Material You Send Us is a Contribution that is
received by PBROTRIB from a Rights Holder. The Contribution may be solicited or unsolicited. The following are examples of Material You Send Us:
PBROTRIB has seen the Rights Holders’ photograph on a third party website. PBROTRIB contacts the
Rights Holder and asks to use the photograph. (Solicited). A Rights Holder speculatively submits a range of photographs to and for PBROTRIB’s use. The Editor may or may not decide to use one or more of the photographs. (Unsolicited) Material You Send Us does not include UGC, Material We Request You To Send Us or material that is governed under any
other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to accept any Material You Send Us for review and if accepted for review is under no obligation to offer a Contract. Should PBROTRIB decide that it wishes to use the Contribution, it will be governed by the terms of this Charter. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. If you wish to submit a speculative Contribution to us, please
contact the appropriate PBROTRIB title. Please note that PBROTRIB will not be able to acknowledge receipt of your Contribution and any submission is at the Rights Holder’s own risk.
Material You Send Us – Licence Terms
PBROTRIB believes that Material You Send Us is the
Rights Holder’s property and that the Rights Holder should not need to give up all its rights for the Contribution to be used by PBROTRIB. Therefore, by
sending us a Contribution, the Rights Holder grants the following irrevocable licence in perpetuity to PBROTRIB: The right to publish, reproduce, licence and sell the Contribution as part of the Publication throughout the world in the following formats:
-- the physical printed Publication;
-- in a replica layout in any electronic format of
the Publication;
-- on the website version of the Publication;
-- in any PBROTRIB apps delivering the Publication
to a reader; and
-- on any PBROTRIB social media pages.
-- The right to publish extracts or the whole of
the Publication (which may or may not include the Contribution) when promoting PBROTRIB’s business or subscriptions in media advertisement, show cards and other promotional aids. The Right to authorise The Newspaper Licensing Agency and similar reprographic rights organisations in other jurisdictions (“RROs”) to distribute or license the distribution of your Contribution throughout the world in any language(s) for RROs’ licensed acts and purposes as amended from time to time, and to keep available your Contribution through such RROs. The unlimited right to amend, edit, select, crop, retouch, add to or delete any part of the Contribution, in any format, whether electronic or otherwise, including the right to remove or amend any meta data associated with the Contribution.

The right to store the Contribution electronically.
In return for the licence granted in relation to the Material You Send Us, PBROTRIB will endeavour to provide the Credit with the Contribution. The licence granted to PBROTRIB shall survive any termination of the agreement between PBROTRIB and the
Rights Holder. Material We Request From You
Material We Request From You is a Contribution that
has specifically commissioned by PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB will contact a Rights Holder and
commission them to provide a Contribution in relation to a brief. An example of Material We Request From You is: PBROTRIB needs a photograph of a country building. PBROTRIB instructs the Rights Holder to attend the venue and take picture of the building. Material We Request From You does not include UGC, Material You Send Us or material that is governed under any other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB . The Rights Holder will provide its own equipment and materials to fulfil its obligation for Material We Request From You. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. Material We Request From You –
Assignment and Licence
PBROTRIB believes that Material We Request From You should be PBROTRIB ’s property as PBROTRIB has requested the Rights Holder’s services and instructed them to create the Contribution on its behalf. However, PBROTRIB acknowledges that the Right Holder may need a licence from PBROTRIB to
use the Contribution for limited purposes. Therefore, in submitting Material We Request From You to PBROTRIB , the Rights Holder assigns to PBROTRIB with full title, right and interest all existing and future intellectual property rights in the Contribution. In return, PBROTRIB will endeavour to give a Credit to the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB grants the Rights Holder a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to use the Contribution in its own online and offline portfolio, provided that the following copyright notice is applied to the Contribution “©Peterborough
Tribune, used under limited licence”.
General notes about Rights: Any rights granted to PBROTRIB or the Rights Holder under this Charter shall survive termination of the Contract for any reason. Rights Holder Promises The Rights Holder promises: that it owns the Contribution and / or is (and will continue to be) authorised to grant the rights to PBROTRIB; nothing in the Contribution is blasphemous, discriminatory, defamatory, untrue, misleading or unlawful; that the Contribution complies with the NUJ Code of Professional Conduct and the Independent
Press Standards Organisations Editors’ regulations and Code of Practice; the Contribution does not contain any virus, Trojan horse, hidden computer software or similar; the Contribution does not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party; where the Contribution contains Personal Data, all
the necessary consents in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998 have been obtained; where the Contribution contains images of children under the age of 16, written parental consent has been obtained and can be provided on request; and maintain and comply with, at all times, the highest ethical standards in the preparation, creation and delivery of the Contribution.
Complaints In the event that a complaint is raised in relation to a Contribution, the Rights Holder agrees to co-operate fully with any internal or external investigation or process. Status. The Rights Holder is an independent contractor and nothing in the Charter shall render the Rights Holder an employee, worker,
agent or partner of PBROTRIB. The Rights Holder is responsible for any taxes/national insurance payable in relation to any services provided under the Charter.
Indemnity The Rights Holder shall keep PBROTRIB indemnified in full against all loss incurred or paid by PBROTRIB as a result of or in connection with any claim made against PBROTRIB by a third party:
arising out of, or in connection with the Contribution, to the extent that such claim arises out of the breach of this or any terms of this Charter (including any Special Terms); and for actual or alleged infringement of a third party's intellectual property rights arising out of, or in connection with the use of the Contribution except in so far as the claim arises as a result of changes made by PBROTRIB or a breach of the Licence by PBROTRIB.
Variation of the Charter No variation of any term of this Charter will be effective, unless it is set out in writing (letter, fax or email) and signed by
a relevant authorised representative of PBROTRIB. If you wish to submit a Contribution and are unable to agree with the terms of this Charter or if you
have any questions regarding this Charter, please contact a relevant authorised representative of the PBROTRIB publication.
Problems & Disputes In the event of a problem or dispute in relation to a Licence and/or in connection with this Charter, in the first instance the Rights Holder and the Editor will look to resolve the dispute amicably. Application of the Charter Unless otherwise agreed, this Charter shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and English courts will have exclusive jurisdiction