https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com

Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Friday, April 24, 2015

Barts: Too Big to fail: Peterborough City Hospital, Too Small tto save?



Embedded image permalink








None of our Peterborough election hopefuls, have addressed the 'elephant in the room' Peterborough City Hospital [PCH], which like Barts Hospital in London has a huge PFI debt hanging over its head. The only difference is that Barts has been placed in Special Measures. It might be the best outcome for PCH which is still spending public money - it does not have - like water. 


This thoughtful post from  David Rason of Interim Partners might give our readers some ammunition to use on the doorstep. Remember promises made on the doorstep by election hopefuls are worth absolutely nothing  (The Twitter feeds give you an idea of how low they are sinking....) and have no legal standing once they are in power!



Barts: Too big to fail?



‘Too big to fail’ is a term often associated  with financial institutions and used to suggest that certain businesses, so interconnected and so large are worth being supported by government when facing potential failure.   


So why discuss Barts Healthcare NHS Trust?


It is, after all, a public service organisation. When we ask if an organisation is too big to fail, I think we are asking if a big organisation, for what it provides or serves, is best in this form – in this case clinically and financially.  I also use the term ‘failure’ very carefully. Barts has many positives to shout about too, with a very dedicated workforce, working within a significantly challenged organisation.


Barts is the largest NHS Trust with five hospitals and an income in excess of £1.2 billion.  The Trust was placed in special measures in March 2015 by the NHS Trust Development Authority due to a critical CQC report combined with challenges in meeting national waiting time standards and a very challenging financial position. As an interim management provider of healthcare finance professionals, the financial challenges facing NHS organisations and Barts interest me enormously.
The financial challenges that Barts faces are immense. 


In February 2015 it was announced that the predicted year end deficit for the Trust had doubled to £93 million.  The Trust has an unaffordable PFI contract, and in 2010 there was discussion surrounding a merger between Barts & The Royal London (as it was then) and University College London Hospitals to avert unmanageable PFI repayments.  Bart’s Cost Improvement Programme has been watched with interest and the Trust’s CIP slippage against projections has been ongoing for some years.


Do these financial challenges (admittedly, which many NHS organisations – and not just the biggest face) suggest that the NHS Trust model needs to change or that there needs to be a move towards larger NHS Trusts?  It’s a very interesting question (do read my blog on whether the FT model is relevant). Many of the largest NHS Trusts have faced financial difficulties or their financial challenges are ongoing and indeed exacerbated due to the scarcity of money within the system.  In my view, the NHS needs significantly more money, and it needs it quickly.  In the case of Barts, I also believe that siphoning off the PFI contract is a necessity. The push towards NHS Vanguards and vertical or horizontal integration presents opportunities and challenges to the big bastions of NHS Healthcare.


Are Trusts like Barts the future, either in terms of the challenges that will be faced or in terms of their size and scale? Consolidation within many parts of the private and public sector has been a trend for years. Should or will NHS Trusts continue to mirror this? (Several have merged or been ‘acquired’). I suspect larger NHS Trusts are the future, but only those that have vertically integrated.
What do you think? Are large NHS Trusts best?  Are they ‘too big to fail’ or do the services that they provide need reconfiguring?  Do the largest NHS Trusts have a future or will their composition change? As always, I’m very interested to hear from you.


David Rason is a Consultant for Healthcare at Interim Partners.
http://blog.interimpartners.com/barts-too-big-to-fail.html









E&OE google.com/+JulianBray Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 (Option: Reportophone enhanced) ISDN COOBE LINK: +44 (0) 1733 345020 [G722 & ATX Codecs] IPHONE 0743 303145 http://feeds.feedburner.com/BraysDuckhouseBlog
> PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment

P'BORO TRIB. SEARCH ENGINE

LONDON EVENING STANDARD NEWSREEL

google83466ac7cb7103b1.html]

JULIAN BRAY AVIATION SECURITY NEWS 01733 345581 UK ISDN 01733 345020


UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.


Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.


We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.




OUR HUMAN RIGHT TO LAMPOON AND CRITICISE POLITICIANS

THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

NUJ CODE OF CONDUCT

NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.


Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)