Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Monday, August 03, 2015


By Lucy Fisher
We are currently undergoing a transformation in how we approach mental health in this country, with it occupying a much more prominent role in the news, in the health sector and in parliament. This has been particularly evident in recent months, first in the run up to the general election, and again following the budget announcements around welfare at the beginning of July.
Given that one in four people in the UK will suffer a mental health problem in their lifetime [1], it would be difficult to argue that this isn’t something that affects all of us. But despite its prevalence, stigma remains one of the biggest challenges that people with mental health problems face.
A poll published by ComRes and the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme last week showed that seven in ten (69%) adults think most people in Britain judge people with mental health illnesses more negatively than those with physical illnesses. Only 15% of Britons think they are judged more positively. Among MPs this stigma is seen as one of the biggest issues for people with mental health issues, with half of MPs (50%) identifying stigma as one of the main challenges facing those suffering mental health problems such as depression, according to a recent poll conducted by ComRes and Lundbeck.
The imbalance in how we judge physical and mental health, and the stigma that still surrounds the latter, extends from the social sphere to the healthcare sphere. Mental health accounts for 11% of the overall NHS budget, while representing almost a quarter (23%) of the overall disease burden in the UK. [2]
This has not gone unnoticed by the government, which in 2012 took on a legal responsibility to deliver parity of esteem by 2020, as part of the Health & Social Care Act. Much has been made of the improvements this could bring for overall healthcare. But besides the availability of quality healthcare, or lack thereof, a major deterrent to seeking treatment is stigma.
More research is needed if we are to fully understand how stigma impacts those that have a mental health illness, and how this impact may vary across different demographics. ComRes data suggests, for example, that younger age groups perceive more negative judgement around mental health problems than those aged 55 and above.
Women are also over-represented in the statistics on mental health in the UK, with one in four women seeking treatment for depression compared to one in ten men. Unfortunately, this cannot be taken to mean that men on the whole do not suffer much in terms of their mental health: the suicide rate is three times higher among men than it is among women, and it is the most common cause of death among men under the age of 35.
If our healthcare system is to truly deliver parity of esteem by 2020, we need to have a better understanding of the stigma that prevents certain groups from talking about mental health and accessing care, and how that stigma can be reduced. As a nation we are talking more about mental health, and talking is good, but we need to know that the message is getting across, and to the right people.
More robust research is needed, that explores the different elements that underpin perceptions of mental health – whether these be personal experience, the portrayal of mental health in the media, or the current public dialogue surrounding the issue. This will allow the government and local authorities to take more effective measures to effectively tackle stigma, and to successfully establish an equal footing for both mental and physical health in the UK.

E&OE Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 ISDN COOBE LINK: +44 (0) 1733 345020 IPHONE 0743 303 145 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment





UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)