Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Thursday, December 17, 2015

SOLAR PANELS: "Huge, misguided cuts" to clean energy after Govt. announced reductions of almost two-thirds to subsidies for solar panels on homes.

The Government has been accused of "huge, misguided cuts" to clean energy after it announced reductions of almost two-thirds to subsidies for solar panels on homes.

The move, which ministers say is necessary to curb rising costs of green energy on consumer bills, comes just days after the UK backed the world's first universal agreement to avoid dangerous climate change by bringing down greenhouse gas emissions.

Reductions in payments under the "feed-in tariff" scheme for energy generated by new small-scale renewables are not as severe as originally proposed in the summer, when ministers floated an 87% cut for domestic solar electricity compared with current levels.

Domestic solar panels will receive 4.39p per kilowatt hour of renewable electricity generated, down 64% on the 12p they would have received from January and 65% less than current levels, although more than the 1.63p originally proposed.

Opponents said the overall budget for small-scale wind, solar, hydro and anaerobic digestion projects under the feed-in tariff programme was set at £100 million until 2018, or £35 million a year.

They warned this is significantly less than the £175 million paid out to polluting diesel generation in the latest "capacity market" scheme, which provides payments to power plants to be on stand-by to start generating if needed to ensure the lights stay on.

The solar industry, which had said the cuts could cause tens of thousands of job losses, warned that the new tariffs are not high enough to support the sector, and ministers must do more to boost solar power.

Paul Barwell, chief executive of the Solar Trade Association, said: "Government has partially listened. It's not what we needed, but it's better than the original proposals, and we will continue to push for a better deal for what will inevitably be a more consolidated industry with fewer companies.

"However, in a world that has just committed to strengthened climate action in Paris and which sees solar as the future, the UK Government needs to get behind the British solar industry."

And he said: "Allocating only around 1% of its clean power budget to new solar is too little, particularly when solar is now so cost-effective. Poor ambition for solar risks missing out on not only our renewable energy targets in the UK, but on the world's greatest economic opportunity too."

The STA also said it was "very concerned" about plans to pause the feed-in tariffs scheme for four weeks before the new payments came in, which will prevent new installations getting the better subsidy rate before then but which could damage the industry further.

The highest subsidies for solar under the new rates will be for schemes of the kind of size schools would have or small commercial arrays, but even this has seen a significant cut in payments.

The Government said the new tariffs would give a rate of return of almost 5% for solar power, almost 6% for small-scale wind power schemes and more than 9% for small hydropower projects.
Friends of the Earth renewable energy campaigner Alasdair Cameron said: "Less than a week after the UK Government agreed in Paris to keep global temperatures well below two degrees, the Government has shown its true colours - and they're certainly not green.

"These huge, misguided cuts to UK solar are a massive blow for jobs and the economy, and further undermine the Government's already tarnished credibility on tackling climate change.

"Massive public opposition to the Government's original proposal may have forced ministers to modify their plans, but this is still terrible news for the UK and its small-scale renewables industry."

Greenpeace UK energy campaigner Barbara Stoll said: "Bowing to pressure from the public and leading businesses, the Government has swapped a blunt axe for a sharp scalpel, but it's still cutting in the wrong place."

She criticised the Government for cutting solar subsidies while backing nuclear power, warning that the new reactor at Hinkley Point would swallow up four years' worth of subsidies for the whole solar sector in just a month.

"Why are ministers signing a blank cheque for expensive, outdated nuclear power whilst pinching pennies for an energy source on the cusp of a massive investment boom? This makes no economic sense and will only put up bills in the long run.

"With costs falling, demand rising, and post-Paris momentum growing, the UK solar sector will see off the Government's attacks. The question is how many more jobs, investments and business opportunities are we wasting because of George Osborne's incoherent policies?"

Shadow energy and climate secretary Lisa Nandy said: "These short-sighted cuts will place big limits on our solar industry and lead to job losses.

"These cuts stand in stark contrast to the generous handouts ministers recently announced to dirty diesel generators. At a time when energy bills are a big concern, it makes no sense to limit one of the cheapest forms of clean energy."

Solar is consistently backed by around 80% of people in regular surveys by the Government.

Green Party MP Caroline Lucas welcomed the fact that the Government had "rowed back slightly" on the cuts, but warned they would still be deeply damaging.

"Rather than really rethinking these disastrous and deeply unpopular plans, ministers will inflict serious damage on an industry which creates thousands of jobs and is a vital part of a zero-carbon future," she said.

"The Government's strong words on climate change ahead of the Paris summit are being revealed to be nothing short of bluster and spin.

"Ministers happily take credit for being climate champions on an international stage while flagrantly undermining the renewable industry here at home."

E&OE Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 IPHONE 0743 303 145 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment





UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)