Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Tuesday, March 01, 2016


Conservative election tactics which saw bus loads of activists turn up to campaign in marginal seats should be probed by police, in case they broke strict spending limits, defeated candidates have claimed.

Tory MPs benefited from the efforts of the RoadTrip campaign which involved battle buses arriving in key target seats.

The Conservative Party insisted that spending on the campaign was in accordance with election laws.

A Daily Mirror investigation found the controversial RoadTrip events helped 24 Tory MPs win their local contests but none declared it in their campaign budget.

Labour MP John Mann told the newspaper "it's a matter for the police" while ex-MP Nick Palmer, who was defeated in May 2015 following a RoadTrip visit to his Broxtowe seat said: "It is extremely worrying.

"I think it would be appropriate for the police to review the evidence and there could be calls for by-elections. "

Government minister Anna Soubry held the seat, which was visited by a RoadTrip team and Home Secretary Theresa May in the days leading up to the May 7 election.

Liberal Democrat Paul Burstow was defeated in Sutton and Cheam, where the winning Conservative candidate Paul Scully received a visit from RoadTrip on the eve of the election.

- Advertisement -
Mr Burstow's local Lib Dem party told the newspaper: "It is important elections are fought on a level playing field and any doubt over expenses occurred taints the process.

"I hope Mr Scully and his agent answer the questions put to them and would like to see a proper investigation."

Another former Lib Dem MP Martin Horwood, who lost to the Conservatives in Cheltenham, told the Daily Mirror: "We knew the Tories ran a huge campaign here. My impression was they broke the spirit rather than the letter of the election spending rules.

"But if there is a hint they might have actually broken the law, then that needs to be fully investigated. I would support calls for an inquiry."

The Conservatives said campaign events organised by the central headquarters, known as CCHQ, to promote the party form part of the national spending return rather than appear in the individual candidate's accounts.

A Conservative spokesman said: "MPs' election expense returns for the 2015 election were completed and returned by election agents in accordance with the law.

"CCHQ campaigned across the country for the return of a Conservative government. Such campaigning would be part of the national return, not local return."


But there again the Conservatives were never very good with figures or public money. Here is deposed Marco Cereste trying to add up the numbers as Carol Vorderman does. He's squirming on Paul 'Abacus' Staintons esteemed BBC Cambridgeshire Wireless Programme

E&OE Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment





UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)