Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Monday, October 10, 2016

SUPPLY TEACHER AGENCY dishes out the lines to ITV THIS MORNING over the £1.26 billion spent on supply (temporary) treachers

Its taken a couple of days for the grandly titled Association of Professional Staffing Companies (APSCo) to respond to claims that schools are ‘at the mercy of agencies’ made during a special report on teacher recruitment by ITV’s Good Morning Britain.

ITV’s report focused on the simple fact that private recruitment firms charge what some school leaders believe are unreasonable fees which all have to be paid out of taxpayer public funding for sourcing candidates and highlighted the fact that a staggering £1.26 billion was spent on supply teachers in England in 2014/2015.

 Samantha Hurley, Operations Director of APSCo, who represent over fifty commission charging teacher recruitment agencies, commented:  “Some headteachers dispute an introduction fee for supply teachers working through agencies, who then get an offer of a permanent post – on the basis that the school has been paying ‘agency fees’ throughout the lifecycle of the contract.”

“The fact that this issue is even being debated seems to stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of how the supply chain actually works. Most of the ‘fee’ goes to pay the teacher – the margin that goes to the recruitment firm is relatively small. Country-wide talent shortages mean that an increasing number of schools are relying on supply teachers. These have to be sourced, interviewed and vetted – at a cost to the recruitment firm – not the school. The cost of compliance – in terms of the checks needed, and the staff to undergo those checks and keep up to date with legal requirements is high. Sourcing the right skills can often mean overseas trips to run careers fairs to attract qualified teachers to work in the UK – again this is a cost to the recruitment company – not the school.”

"While some schools may simply see investment in recruitment as a hefty expense, from our members’ perspective, recruiters  [agencies] are providing a crucial service which the education of our children relies on.”

“Consequently, an introduction fee is wholly appropriate and proportionate given the amount of time and expense borne by the recruitment firm.”

Headteacher, Serge Cefai, who was interviewed for ITV’s piece, complained that “supply agencies” ‘grab hold of budding teachers before they qualify’ and said he would prefer it if teachers went back to the ‘old fashioned’ way of people applying for jobs.

In response, Hurley continues;

“When it comes to enlisting trainee teachers before they had even started job-hunting, it’s clearly up to the individual students whether they want to sign up with a recruitment firm or not. 

 However, this would not stop a trainee teacher from looking for work directly with schools as well, or with other recruitment firms”

“Chronic talent shortages mean that the ‘old fashioned’ way of recruiting teachers is no longer viable. Schools are struggling to recruit without help – this is not anecdotal – it is fact. A report from the National Audit Office, cites the experience of Sue Croft, principal at Oxford Spires academy in east Oxford, who said she advertised for five posts last term – physics, chemistry, business, geography and English. ‘I didn’t get any applications – not one,’ she said. She finally managed to fill the vacancies by using recruitment companies and has recently appointed five ‘brilliant’ newly qualified teachers for next September from overseas.” E&OE Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581

Post a Comment





UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)