Julian Bray is delighted to have his biographical entry included in the latest edition of Debretts People of Today .... ... PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE Holding officialdom to account. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Over 3/4 of a million page hits, and 3,400 blogposts. We have over 1,680 supporters in the Stanground, Park Farm, Fletton, Cardea (South Stanground) area alone. Our reach covers the whole of the former Unitary Authority and beyond. Our amazingly resourceful supporters send through reports and pictures, over 50 minimotos / motorcycles have been taken off footpaths and the Green Wheel thanks to their unstinting efforts. The current campaign is logging vehicles totally blocking the footway and impacting on fire engine access. (We've given up on grass verge parking, as PCC isn't currently listening !!!) Make no mistake. We WILL expose and/or detect crime; highlight significantly anti-social behaviour; detect fraud, corruption or injustice; disclosing significant incompetence or negligence; protect people's health and safety; prevent people from being misled by some statement or action of an individual or organisation, In short, these elements (and other factors) help to make up what is known as the public interest and disclosing information that assists people to better comprehend or make decisions on matters of public importance. Join our conversation Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch is totally independent and not connected with the Cambridgeshire Neighbourhood Watch which at January 2018 can only show since Feb 2011 45,000 hits! whereas our hit rate (or pageview counter ) records at Jan 2018 some 750,329 page hits and has now (MAY 2018) risen to 760,132. YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

Friday, November 18, 2016

Peterborough City Councillors like a Turkey have just voted for Christmas...

Here’s 2 reasons why I think the Council is far from open or accountable … by Cllr Darren Fower

But back in the land of make believe, join us for our festive tale of the magic beans ......  and if you wish to debate the issue with a Councillor, a couple of them may be lurking around at the Heritage Park Primary School Park Farm Christmas Bazaar on Saturday 27th November from 1pm....

"Jack sold the faithful cow for a handful of magic beans..." Oh yes, he did!

This is an important week for those who can be bothered to follow what happens inside our Pizzaborough Town Hall, effectively the panto season has started.

For a pile of magic beans, Peterborough City Council has  effectively handed over control to a yet to be elected regional Mayor, and dazzled by a hypothetical set of numbers (which to a lay person immediately suggests the council is going to be bailed out with substantial new revenue streams) being devolved from Central Government.

Unfortunately no one seems to have read, and importantly, understood the small print or the 'riders to contract' bear in mind that the grandly named Airports Commission drilled through £20 million just to produce a limp 400 page report which it now turns out relied on data that was some 20 years out of date. .....

The 'pig in the poke' agreed by Peterborough City Council, effectively hands control of our affairs over to Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority ( notice how, for cosmetic reasons, we are tagged on the end of Cambridgeshire) and we all now have to pay for the setting up of this bureaucratic monolith, the PCC is relegated to becoming a constituent member  ie one single vote in the new set up.  

Clause V is interesting and a master of the kind of double speak we have all endured over the introduction of Personal Independence Payments. Blinded by the fact that seemingly eyewatering sums of 'extra' public funding will be coming our way, to kick start all kinds of 'magical' inward investment programmes, seemingly no one has properly looked at the small print.

Clause V:  to recommend to the Combined Authority that the costs of establishing the Combined Authority, holding the elections in May 2017 and running the Combined Authority (including Mayoral Office) for 2016/17 and 2017/18 are funded from the gain share grant provided by Government (as outlined in para 12.11)      

In short it means that in exchange for 'additional' funding being released, we now have to use that money not for housing or the benefit of the City but to TOTALLY fund the establishment of the Combined Authority. This is a major expense and will certainly earmark a major element of the funding released by Central Government. 

We would suggest someone flicks back through the accounts of the outgoing Police Commissioner, Sir Graham ('Dimbut')Bright, and take a closer look at the public funds wasted just to physically set up his office, (possibly to suit his lifestyle?) rerouting secure police computer networks which has now been dismantled, and the PCC office now moved into police property in Huntingdon. Where it should have been in the first place.  

The second flaw in this nonsense is "authorise the Combined Authority to have a power to issue a levy to the constituent Councils in respect of any financial year" again the pot of gold from central government will be raided year on year to keep the Combined Authority going.

Bluntly no matter what they spend, there is no effective cap on expenditure, as the combined authority will have the power to issue 'a levy in ...respect of any financial year' there is no end date it could go on forever...  a new regionwide money pit...

But fear not we have a couple of 'Brains of Britain' voting on our behalf to manage the one single vote we have in this new all powerful Combined Authority. With respect Cllr. Holdich Leader of the Council, is a bit long in the tooth, to get his brain around this whole new byzantine multi-level layers of techno driven bureaucracy.  By the time its properly set up, Cllr Holdich would possibly be a prime candidate for one of the Councils own care homes - apart from the fact that Cllr Fitz. scrapped them all, and turfed out the long term residents, in their twilight years. 

Oh Cllr Fitzgerald is the second named 'Brain of Britain' on the list to represent our one single vote.

To be fair, the deal if you just read the executive summary it looks inviting, but in reality the devil is in the detail, yes additional funding is released, but equally an expensive regional monolith has to be continually financially primed  with resources and there seems to be no end date... magic beans!  

The council executive argue that if we don't sign up we will lose:

Funding for Housing development
·         Funding for Infrastructure growth
·         Additional powers to make decisions locally
·         Government commitment to work with Peterborough to develop Peterborough University and an Enterprise Zone

Simply it is another example of project fear, bear in mind this whole crazy project was a Cameron invention and hatched in the balmy pre 'Brexit' days. 

Realistically if we did lose all these 'benefits'  then central government would immediately collapse. There will always be funding for housing development and funding for infrastructure growth.

However 'the government   commitment to work with Peterborough to develop Peterborough University' will never ever happen in our lifetime, not with Cambridge academia being a key player in this Combined Authority. 

Also there is no commercial traction for an enterprise zone, we are zoned for the building of sheds, the revised routing of HS2 and HS2 has seen to that. Question why the route deliberately arcs around and well away from Peterborough?

In addition the media is deserting the City, during 2017 the BBC will close down the Peterborough office and possibly the local newspaper will move its newsroom to a hub operation several hundred miles from the City.

The so called Community TV station is never likely to happen, although one group is still soliciting for 'donations' To understand why it won't happen just read the latest Ofcom directives. 

The Combined Authority will see others who have not been supportive of Peterborough, tactically using their votes against anything we might try and do.   

The Cabinet agreed to:
(i)      consent to the Secretary of State making an Order to establish the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (Appendix A);
(ii)     consent to the Council being a constituent member of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority with effect from the commencement date determined by the final Order;
(iii)    authorise the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to consent to the final draft Order and associated documents, specifically:
-        to agree minor drafting amendments to the Combined Authority Order to be laid before Parliament;
-        to consent to the Council being included within the draft Parliamentary Order thereby reflecting this Council’s decision
(iv)    authorise the Combined Authority to have a power to issue a levy to the constituent Councils in respect of any financial year. (This will be subject to the inclusion of a unanimity clause in the Combined Authority constitution on this specific matter).
(v)     to recommend to the Combined Authority that the costs of establishing the Combined Authority, holding the elections in May 2017 and running the Combined Authority (including Mayoral Office) for 2016/17 and 2017/18 are funded from the gain share grant provided by Government (as outlined in para 12.11)
(vi)    appoint Councillor Holdich to act as Council's appointee to the Shadow Combined Authority and once established, to the Combined Authority;
(vii)   appoint Councillor Fitzgerald as Deputy Leader of the Council, to act as the substitute to the above (ref (vi));
(viii)  note the outcome of the public consultation on the establishment of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority as outlined in paragraph 5.1 and 5.2 and Appendices 2A - 2D;
(ix)    note the timetable for the implementation of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough devolution Order as summarised in paragraph 7.1;
(x)     note the Government's response to the outline business case for Housing capital investment funds secured as part of the devolution deal as set out in Appendix 3.       
(xi)    agree in principle, for a protocol requiring the Council Leader and the representative on the Overview and Scrutiny Committee to report to each meeting of Council setting out the activities and decisions related to their respective roles within the Combined Authority.
(xii)   to request that the Member Officer Working Group develop the protocol through the Audit Committee with a view to inclusion of the protocol in the Council’s constitution.
*The Waive of call-in provision has been invoked on this decision. The reason being that the matter has been publically debated at the Full Council meeting of 17 November 2016.

Reasons for the decision:

To consult on a scheme for the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough area with a directly elected Mayor, in order to devolve powers from Government to a Combined Authority.
To bring additional new funding to the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough area with local decision making for these funds.

Alternative options considered:

The Governance Review considered a number of alternative options and concluded that the most appropriate option for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough is to establish a Mayoral Combined Authority.
If the Combined Authority is not established the Council will lose the opportunities made available through the devolution agreement, including:
·         Funding for Housing development
·         Funding for Infrastructure growth
·         Additional powers to make decisions locally
·         Government commitment to work with Peterborough to develop a Peterborough University and an Enterprise Zone

Interests and Nature of Interests Declared:


Background Documents:

Council - 27 June 2016 Agenda Item No. 4 (including Statutory Governance Review, Devolution Proposal and Devolution Scheme)
Publication date: 17/11/2016
Date of decision: 17/11/2016
Accompanying Documents:
  • It is not anticipated that there will be any documents other than the report and relevant appendices to be published.

 E&OE Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment




The Peterborough Tribune supports:

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) an international non-profit organisation working to defend the freedom to be informed and to inform others throughout the world.

Today, 30 years since its creation, RSF has enough experience and on-the-ground support to defend press freedom on a global scale. RSF accomplishes its work through its wide network of correspondents established in 130 countries, its 12 offices (Vienna, Brussels, Rio de Janeiro, Helsinki, Berlin, Madrid, Stockholm, Geneva, Tunis, Washington DC, London, and Paris) and its consultative status at the United Nations, UNESCO, and the Council of Europe.

As a leading defender of press freedom and freedom of information, RSF alternates public interventions and effective behind-the-scenes actions.

THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens.

We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independently resourced Neighbourhood Watch Scheme. A scheme operated following written guidelines to us directly from the Home Office.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)


Rights Holder Charter
Version: January 2009 v.3
This Rights Holder Charter (“Charter”) sets out the terms and conditions governing the relationship between Julian Bray, Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch blog entitled Peterborough Tribune (PBROTRIB) on the Blogger and other platforms, and an individual or company making a Contribution to PBROTRIB (“Rights Holder”). The purpose of this document is to ensure that the Charter terms are
incorporated into to all Contracts with each Rights Holder, so both parties areclear as to how PBROTRIB may use content. This Charter does not apply to content submitted:
· using a feature or interactive service that allows
the individual to upload to and display content on any of PBROTRIB websites
(including social sites), apps, WAP sites or any web address owned or operated
by PBROTRIB as may link to the terms accessible at
(User-Generated Content (“UGC”)); or
This Charter applies to all Rights Holder Contributions, except where the Rights Holder is already subject to a separate
written agreement with PBROTRIB in relation to Contributions, or where PBROTRIB
has agreed in writing to vary or amend the Charter due to exceptional circumstances. Formation of the Contract

By sending PBROTRIB a Contribution you are making
an offer to PBROTRIB to use the Contribution.’ PBROTRIB’s use of the
Contribution is acceptance of your offer and creates a Contract on the terms of this Charter. Submission of a Contribution by you is an acknowledgement that
you agree to the terms of this Charter. If you do not agree to the Charter you must email us as soon as possible to raise your objection and withdraw your
submitted Contribution, otherwise you will be deemed to have accepted the Charter terms.
Contract: the agreement between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution incorporating this Charter and the Special Terms (where applicable);
Contribution: material (written, audio, visual, video or audiovisual) created by the Rights Holder and will be
classified as either Material You Send Us or Material We Request From You;
Credit: for Material You Send Us “© [insert name of Rights Holder and Year]”;
Publication: means one or more publications owned or operated by PBROTRIB. Licence: the licence granted by the Rights Holder to PBROTRIB
as set out in the Licence sections of this Charter;
Personal Data: has the same meaning as provided in section 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998;
Material You Send Us: a Contribution as set out under the Material You Send Us paragraph;
Material We Request From You: A Contribution as set out under the Material We Request From You paragraph; Rights Holder: name of the of the individual or company which has created the relevant Contribution; Special Terms: written terms between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution that are not set out in this Charter and/or vary this Charter; and User-Generated Content: content submitted by an individual through a feature that allows the individual to upload material to any of PBROTRIB websites or social sites.
Conflict with other Agreements: If there is any inconsistency between any of the provisions of this Charter and the Special Terms, the Special Terms shall prevail. To be clear, where no Special Terms are agreed in writing, the Charter will apply without variation. Sending us a Contribution –
The information Rights Holders please provide To PBROTRIB When sending us a Contribution, please provide the following information:
Your Full Name;
Your Full Address; and Your Contact Telephone Number and Email Address.

We will not be able to provide Credits where a
Rights Holder has not provided the relevant information.

Material You Send Us

Material You Send Us is a Contribution that is
received by PBROTRIB from a Rights Holder. The Contribution may be solicited or unsolicited. The following are examples of Material You Send Us:
PBROTRIB has seen the Rights Holders’ photograph on a third party website. PBROTRIB contacts the
Rights Holder and asks to use the photograph. (Solicited). A Rights Holder speculatively submits a range of photographs to and for PBROTRIB’s use. The Editor may or may not decide to use one or more of the photographs. (Unsolicited) Material You Send Us does not include UGC, Material We Request You To Send Us or material that is governed under any
other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to accept any Material You Send Us for review and if accepted for review is under no obligation to offer a Contract. Should PBROTRIB decide that it wishes to use the Contribution, it will be governed by the terms of this Charter. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. If you wish to submit a speculative Contribution to us, please
contact the appropriate PBROTRIB title. Please note that PBROTRIB will not be able to acknowledge receipt of your Contribution and any submission is at the Rights Holder’s own risk.
Material You Send Us – Licence Terms
PBROTRIB believes that Material You Send Us is the
Rights Holder’s property and that the Rights Holder should not need to give up all its rights for the Contribution to be used by PBROTRIB. Therefore, by
sending us a Contribution, the Rights Holder grants the following irrevocable licence in perpetuity to PBROTRIB: The right to publish, reproduce, licence and sell the Contribution as part of the Publication throughout the world in the following formats:
-- the physical printed Publication;
-- in a replica layout in any electronic format of
the Publication;
-- on the website version of the Publication;
-- in any PBROTRIB apps delivering the Publication
to a reader; and
-- on any PBROTRIB social media pages.
-- The right to publish extracts or the whole of
the Publication (which may or may not include the Contribution) when promoting PBROTRIB’s business or subscriptions in media advertisement, show cards and other promotional aids. The Right to authorise The Newspaper Licensing Agency and similar reprographic rights organisations in other jurisdictions (“RROs”) to distribute or license the distribution of your Contribution throughout the world in any language(s) for RROs’ licensed acts and purposes as amended from time to time, and to keep available your Contribution through such RROs. The unlimited right to amend, edit, select, crop, retouch, add to or delete any part of the Contribution, in any format, whether electronic or otherwise, including the right to remove or amend any meta data associated with the Contribution.

The right to store the Contribution electronically.
In return for the licence granted in relation to the Material You Send Us, PBROTRIB will endeavour to provide the Credit with the Contribution. The licence granted to PBROTRIB shall survive any termination of the agreement between PBROTRIB and the
Rights Holder. Material We Request From You
Material We Request From You is a Contribution that
has specifically commissioned by PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB will contact a Rights Holder and
commission them to provide a Contribution in relation to a brief. An example of Material We Request From You is: PBROTRIB needs a photograph of a country building. PBROTRIB instructs the Rights Holder to attend the venue and take picture of the building. Material We Request From You does not include UGC, Material You Send Us or material that is governed under any other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB . The Rights Holder will provide its own equipment and materials to fulfil its obligation for Material We Request From You. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. Material We Request From You –
Assignment and Licence
PBROTRIB believes that Material We Request From You should be PBROTRIB ’s property as PBROTRIB has requested the Rights Holder’s services and instructed them to create the Contribution on its behalf. However, PBROTRIB acknowledges that the Right Holder may need a licence from PBROTRIB to
use the Contribution for limited purposes. Therefore, in submitting Material We Request From You to PBROTRIB , the Rights Holder assigns to PBROTRIB with full title, right and interest all existing and future intellectual property rights in the Contribution. In return, PBROTRIB will endeavour to give a Credit to the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB grants the Rights Holder a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to use the Contribution in its own online and offline portfolio, provided that the following copyright notice is applied to the Contribution “©Peterborough
Tribune, used under limited licence”.
General notes about Rights: Any rights granted to PBROTRIB or the Rights Holder under this Charter shall survive termination of the Contract for any reason. Rights Holder Promises The Rights Holder promises: that it owns the Contribution and / or is (and will continue to be) authorised to grant the rights to PBROTRIB; nothing in the Contribution is blasphemous, discriminatory, defamatory, untrue, misleading or unlawful; that the Contribution complies with the NUJ Code of Professional Conduct and the Independent
Press Standards Organisations Editors’ regulations and Code of Practice; the Contribution does not contain any virus, Trojan horse, hidden computer software or similar; the Contribution does not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party; where the Contribution contains Personal Data, all
the necessary consents in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998 have been obtained; where the Contribution contains images of children under the age of 16, written parental consent has been obtained and can be provided on request; and maintain and comply with, at all times, the highest ethical standards in the preparation, creation and delivery of the Contribution.
Complaints In the event that a complaint is raised in relation to a Contribution, the Rights Holder agrees to co-operate fully with any internal or external investigation or process. Status. The Rights Holder is an independent contractor and nothing in the Charter shall render the Rights Holder an employee, worker,
agent or partner of PBROTRIB. The Rights Holder is responsible for any taxes/national insurance payable in relation to any services provided under the Charter.
Indemnity The Rights Holder shall keep PBROTRIB indemnified in full against all loss incurred or paid by PBROTRIB as a result of or in connection with any claim made against PBROTRIB by a third party:
arising out of, or in connection with the Contribution, to the extent that such claim arises out of the breach of this or any terms of this Charter (including any Special Terms); and for actual or alleged infringement of a third party's intellectual property rights arising out of, or in connection with the use of the Contribution except in so far as the claim arises as a result of changes made by PBROTRIB or a breach of the Licence by PBROTRIB.
Variation of the Charter No variation of any term of this Charter will be effective, unless it is set out in writing (letter, fax or email) and signed by
a relevant authorised representative of PBROTRIB. If you wish to submit a Contribution and are unable to agree with the terms of this Charter or if you
have any questions regarding this Charter, please contact a relevant authorised representative of the PBROTRIB publication.
Problems & Disputes In the event of a problem or dispute in relation to a Licence and/or in connection with this Charter, in the first instance the Rights Holder and the Editor will look to resolve the dispute amicably. Application of the Charter Unless otherwise agreed, this Charter shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and English courts will have exclusive jurisdiction