Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Wednesday, March 01, 2017

Property management company director jailed for fraud

Jailed, Mark Procter, 50,

The director of a Cambridgeshire property management company has been jailed after admitting stealing £140,000 of clients' money.

Mark Procter, 50, of Barker Close in Hail Weston, St Neots, appeared at Cambridge Crown Court on Friday (February 24 2017 and was sentenced to a total of three years and four months in prison.

The court heard how he withdrew clients' deposits throughout 2014 and 2015 to pay for divorce proceedings and luxury holidays.

A police investigation was launched in July 2015 after the National Approved Lettings Scheme discovered one of their member firms, Kirby Property Management, had falsified an accounts report and bank statements.

Allegations were made that Procter had moved clients' deposit money from allocated bank accounts into his own personal account and spent the money for his own personal gain. The forged accounts report was to cover up what was already ongoing with the movement of money.

On January 19 this year (2017) Procter pleaded guilty to fraud by false representation, having signed a form in the name of his accountant and submitted it to the National Approved Lettings Scheme.

He also pleaded guilty to fraud by abuse of position where between April 1, 2013, and July 31, 2015, he made a financial gain for himself from his clients' accounts.

Detective Constable Mat Belfitt said: "In total there were 400 tenants with the company who were all victims of fraud, as well as approximately 400 landlords who have also suffered a loss because of Mr Procter's actions.

"He caused a great inconvenience and a large amount of stress to all involved, turning his hand to criminality in order to fund his personal life going on luxury holidays and buying expensive cars."

The court heard Procter's accountants realised something was not right in June 2015 and contacted the National Approved Letting Scheme. Procter was asked to explain the forgery, which he was unable to do.

The firm that guarantees the deposits for tenants suffered a loss of £140,000 in claims which were pending with those who had their deposits stolen by Procter.

During sentencing, Judge Farrel said: "This is a serious case of dishonesty. The fact you, as a company director, forged the signature of a professional man, an accountant, in order to continue a business is a significant act of dishonesty.

"This went on for a significant period of time and it's a case of significant harm and of high culpability. The affects are so serious only immediate custody is appropriate."

On Friday afternoon Procter was sentenced to three years and four months in prison on both charges, to run concurrently, and was disqualified from being a company director for six years. E&OE Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581 > PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment





UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.

Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.

We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.


THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).


NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)