https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com

Making it happen. Holding officialdom to account. Frank, fearless and free. THE DIGITAL NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH BLOG. Join our conversation https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com YOU MAY NOW VIEW PETERBOROUGH TRIBUNE OVER A SECURE WEB LINK: https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.com PASS IT ON!

PBROtrib PAGEview COUNTER excludes casual browsers scrolling through a selection of posts

Friday, April 21, 2017

You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

Stewart Jackson and friend

PBROTRIB Sketch: Yet again, we are about to witness the Coronation of Stewart Jackson MP, the Conservative MP for part of Peterborough, who claims he is standing again and proud to be judged on his record! HIS RECORD!!!!!!! HE MUST BE JOKING !!!!

Simply many people ( they fail to see any joke ) who are entitled to vote, just cannot be bothered, and think their single vote will not make a difference. The fact is that it will, EVERY SINGLE VOTE COUNTS INCLUDING YOUR VOTE.
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

This year, Police in Cambridgeshire are tightening up on the substantial widespread abuse of the postal vote system, and if it continues at the same rate of blatant abuse as in previous years, then expect the holding cells at Thorpe Wood Police Station to be full to bursting.

Already a number of MPs and their agents may soon be arrested over #Conservatives Battlebus and other overspending on their last election expenses.

This year, Police say the screw will be turned that much tighter. We should say Mr Stewart Jackson was not arrested, or as far as we know, not under suspicion, but if the MP and /or his election team pulls stunts such as hanging huge commercial colour advertising billboards from the offices of the local newspaper, (clearly not biased in any way although the newspaper publishers Johnson Press  carries seemingly without editorial concern his weekly polemic), then clearly a commercial rate for an outdoor advertising prime site needs to be added to his election expenses. These sites are not cheap, a few thousand a pop...  Clearly this time round we are all watching how the financial records are submitted and how the election debt stacks up - for all candidates!
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

Clearly had this been done, Mr Jackson would have in my view dramatically overspent his budget, and if the Representation of the Peoples Act electoral rules were followed to the letter, many say his election should have been reviewed and possibly re-run.  

I challenge Mr Jackson to produce the actual spend in relation to all his electioneering activities, not just the few that the former champion of failed childrens services and former Care Home owner, and Conservative Election Agent Sheila Scott included in her return.
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.


Consider that we live in a democracy but hundreds of Peterborough citizens are routinely blocked by Stewart Jackson MP from his vapid social media feeds. What sort of democracy is that?

We think Stewart Jackson, a former High Street Bank Manager, is a sorry excuse for an MP, and if the Conservative Party in London really knew of some of his antics over the last few years, they would run a mile, and order an immediate reselection putting in someone who will 100% work for this City and its citizens. Closer examination of his facebook and twitter feeds ( if you are not blocked) will underline what we mean. 
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.


Stewart will recall the time when late at night, he telephoned us and let off a stream of quite inventive invective, that would make a bishop blush.

The Conservative Party should in our view also seriously question Mr Jacksons intemperate postings over the closure of the Peterborough Childrens Centres, particularly the terse and the very strange advice he offered to worried parents, single mothers and guardians.

We should not forget some of the decidedly odd parliamentary visits he made, to exotic hot lands, during parliamentary recessions. Its all on the public record and Mr Jackson stands by it! Also as the Peterborough Soup Kitchen is now nightly feeding some 40 to 60 souls, meanwhile the MP is probably to be found fine dining in some of Peterboroughs more expensive watering holes.. 

Speaking of which we should also enquire as to how many thousands of pounds was spent by him or his cohorts on legal advice regarding his brush with the parliamentary bean counters we all hashtagged the debacle  #mpsexpenses  Its on the record, and Mr Jackson stands by it! Good Grief!
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.
 
And before Mr Jackson denies it, or telephones us again, we have it all recorded on tape, and in black and white, colour too on the Peterborough Tribune, plus loads of material sent to us, that is in the process of being independently verified, when we can be bothered to get round to it, after all this is a snap election call, and from what we hear not all conservative party members were consulted. 

Perhaps Mrs May and ex SAS man David Davis in charge of Brexit negotiations should take a closer look at Mr Jacksons record. The Conservative MP Stewart Jackson has repeatedly fallen out with the conservative controlled Peterborough City Council, but still he maintains, he is seeking yet another term and gleefully says its based on his record. Just remember it only takes one EU member to not agree our brexit proposal, just imagine if Stewart Jackson had been negotiating face to face with EU members....think back to the solar farm debacle?

Stewart Jackson stands by his record, he says,  well here it is in detail, from something we posted sometime back. A bit of an eye-opener , do open the links beside each item

How Stewart Jackson voted on Foreign Policy and Defence #
  • Consistently voted for use of UK military forces in combat operations overseas Show votes
  • Consistently voted for an investigation into the Iraq war Show votes
  • Consistently voted for replacing Trident with a new nuclear weapons system Show votes
  • Generally voted against more EU integration Show votes
  • Generally voted for a referendum on the UK's membership of the EU Show votes
  • Almost always voted against strengthening the Military Covenant Show votes
  • Generally voted against a right to remain for EU nationals already in living in the UK Show votes
  • Has never voted on UK membership of the EU
  • Consistently voted for military action against ISIL (Daesh) Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Welfare and Benefits #

  • Consistently voted for reducing housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms (which Labour describe as the "bedroom tax") Show votes
  • Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices Show votes
  • Consistently voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability Show votes
  • Almost always voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support Show votes
  • Consistently voted for a reduction in spending on welfare benefits Show votes
  • Almost always voted against spending public money to create guaranteed jobs for young people who have spent a long time unemployed Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Taxation and Employment #

  • Almost always voted for raising the threshold at which people start to pay income tax Show votes
  • Almost always voted for increasing the rate of VAT Show votes
  • Generally voted for higher taxes on alcoholic drinks Show votes
  • Almost always voted for higher taxes on plane tickets Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles Show votes
  • Generally voted against increasing the tax rate applied to income over £150,000 Show votes
  • Generally voted for encouraging occupational pensions Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against automatic enrolment in occupational pensions Show votes
  • Almost always voted against a banker’s bonus tax Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against higher taxes on banks Show votes
  • Almost always voted against an annual tax on the value of expensive homes (popularly known as a mansion tax) Show votes
  • Generally voted for allowing employees to exchange some employment rights for shares in the company they work for Show votes
  • Consistently voted for more restrictive regulation of trade union activity Show votes
  • Consistently voted for reducing capital gains tax Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Business and the Economy #

  • Almost always voted for reducing the rate of corporation tax Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against measures to reduce tax avoidance Show votes
  • Generally voted for stronger tax incentives for companies to invest in assets Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against new high speed rail infrastructure Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Health #

  • Consistently voted against restricting the provision of services to private patients by the NHS Show votes
  • Consistently voted for reforming the NHS so GPs buy services on behalf of their patients Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against smoking bans Show votes
  • Consistently voted against allowing terminally ill people to be given assistance to end their life Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Education #

  • Consistently voted for greater autonomy for schools Show votes
  • Consistently voted for raising England’s undergraduate tuition fee cap to £9,000 per year Show votes
  • Consistently voted for academy schools Show votes
  • Consistently voted for ending financial support for some 16-19 year olds in training and further education Show votes
  • Consistently voted for university tuition fees Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Constitutional Reform #

  • Almost always voted for reducing central government funding of local government Show votes
  • Consistently voted for an equal number of electors per parliamentary constituency Show votes
  • Almost always voted for fewer MPs in the House of Commons Show votes
  • Has never voted on a transparent Parliament
  • Generally voted against a more proportional system for electing MPs Show votes
  • Generally voted against a wholly elected House of Lords Show votes
  • Generally voted for local councils keeping money raised from taxes on business premises in their areas Show votes
  • Consistently voted for greater restrictions on campaigning by third parties, such as charities, during elections Show votes
  • Generally voted for fixed periods between parliamentary elections Show votes
  • Generally voted against removing hereditary peers from the House of Lords Show votes
  • Almost always voted against transferring more powers to the Welsh Assembly Show votes
  • Almost always voted against transferring more powers to the Scottish Parliament Show votes
  • Generally voted against more powers for local councils Show votes
  • Consistently voted for a veto for MPs from England, Wales and Northern Ireland over laws specifically impacting their part of the UK Show votes
  • Generally voted against a lower voting age Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Home Affairs #

  • Almost always voted for a stricter asylum system Show votes
  • Consistently voted against allowing ministers to intervene in inquests Show votes
  • Consistently voted against introducing ID cards Show votes
  • Consistently voted for the introduction of elected Police and Crime Commissioners Show votes
  • Generally voted for requiring the mass retention of information about communications Show votes
  • Consistently voted for stronger enforcement of immigration rules Show votes
  • Consistently voted for mass surveillance of people’s communications and activities Show votes
  • Consistently voted for merging police and fire services under Police and Crime Commissioners Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Environmental Issues #

  • Generally voted against measures to prevent climate change Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles Show votes
  • Consistently voted for selling England’s state owned forests Show votes
  • Almost always voted for higher taxes on plane tickets Show votes
  • Generally voted against financial incentives for low carbon emission electricity generation methods Show votes
  • Generally voted for culling badgers to tackle bovine tuberculosis Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against greater regulation of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) to extract shale gas Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against new high speed rail infrastructure Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Transport #

  • Consistently voted against greater public control of bus services Show votes
  • Almost always voted against slowing the rise in rail fares Show votes
  • Voted a mixture of for and against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles Show votes
  • Almost always voted for higher taxes on plane tickets Show votes
  • Generally voted against a publicly owned railway system Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Housing #

  • Consistently voted for phasing out secure tenancies for life Show votes
  • Consistently voted for charging a market rent to high earners renting a council home Show votes

How Stewart Jackson voted on Miscellaneous Topics #

  • Generally voted against greater regulation of gambling Show votes
  • Consistently voted for capping civil service redundancy payments Show votes
  • Generally voted against Labour's anti-terrorism laws Show votes
  • Consistently voted for the privatisation of Royal Mail Show votes
  • Generally voted against requiring pub companies to offer pub landlords rent-only leases Show votes
  • Almost always voted for restricting the scope of legal aid Show votes
  • Almost always voted for allowing national security sensitive evidence to be put before courts in secret sessions Show votes
  • Generally voted for a statutory register of lobbyists Show votes
  • Almost always voted for limits on success fees paid to lawyers in no-win no fee cases Show votes
  • Consistently voted against restrictions on fees charged to tenants by letting agents Show votes
  • Generally voted for the policies included in the 2010 Conservative - Liberal Democrat Coalition Agreement
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.



So we invite dear readers to examine that record in detail because if Mr Stewart Jackson is re-elected as MP for part of Peterborough and he remains within the UK Conservatives brexit negotiating team, his future antics could have a very long term detrimental effect on your future, and those still at our overcrowded schools, or failing cash strapped NHS, all on Mr Jacksons watch.

And before Mr Corbyn (and other candidates) jump up and down with glee, it would be a good idea for all of you to do the research on this City, especially if your are briefly visiting and possibly read your script through a few times before delivery...

But whatever your politics do use your vote - possibly tactically  -to get the right outcome and for us it would be to see a Pickfords Removals van outside the Stewart Jackson mansion ( with private swimming pool) as he moves back to an area many miles away, where he might even do some good... gentle reader you fill in the blanks... 
You are blocked from following @Stewart4Pboro and viewing @Stewart4Pboro's Tweets.

https://parkfarmneighbourhoodwatch.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Stewart+Jackson,+Jacco,+Wacco,   Tel:+44 (0) 1733 345581

> PETERBOROUGH TRIB NEWSREEL .
Post a Comment

P'BORO TRIB. SEARCH ENGINE

LONDON EVENING STANDARD NEWSREEL

google83466ac7cb7103b1.html]

JULIAN BRAY AVIATION SECURITY NEWS 01733 345581 UK ISDN 01733 345020


UPDATES: Post are transmitted from a variety of remote sources, immediately published on servers in the USA, additions, updates and any corrections added later on the blog version only.


Editorial policy: WE DON'T CENSOR NEWS, we will however come down hard on lawbreakers, all forms of ASB - Anti Social Behaviour, and anyone or group who seek to disturb or disrupt our neighbourhoods and communities, or in anyway abuse, take unfair advantage or financially disadvantage our citizens. We support the Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch and digitally carry the messages from this independent Neighbourhood Watch Scheme.


We are openly but constructively critical of all political parties (actual and sham), pressure groups, overbearing 'jobsworths' and those who seek to waste public funds, abuse public office, ramp up expenses, BUY VOTES and/or engage in any form of directed or robotic voting.

Whilst accepting that many in Public Office perform a valuable service and make a worthwhile contribution, there are others who are frankly rubbish. Although Julian Bray is the editor, there are several Blog administrators / correspondents who actively contribute by remote transmission to this blog.

So it could be some days before the copy (content) is seen by the Editor and properly formatted. We consider all representations and correct any facts that are clearly deficient.




OUR HUMAN RIGHT TO LAMPOON AND CRITICISE POLITICIANS

THE HIGH COURT has ruled....People have a right to lampoon and criticise politicians and public officials under the Human Rights Act, the High Court has ruled.

We have the full High Court judgment, saved as a page on here. l

ampoon (lampoon) Pronunciation: /lamˈpuːn/ verb [with object] publicly criticize (someone or something) by using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm: the actor was lampooned by the press noun a speech or text lampooning someone or something: the magazine fired at God, Royalty, and politicians, using cartoons and lampoons.

Derivatives: lampooner noun lampoonery noun lampoonist noun Origin: mid 17th century: from French lampon, said to be from lampons 'let us drink' (used as a refrain), from lamper 'gulp down', nasalized form of laper 'to lap (liquid).

NUJ CODE OF CONDUCT

NUJ Code of Conduct

The NUJ's Code of Conduct has set out the main principles of British and Irish journalism since 1936.

The code is part of the rules and all journalists joining the union must sign that they will strive to adhere to the it.


Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:

A journalist:

1 At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed

2 Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair

3 Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies

4 Differentiates between fact and opinion

5 Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means

6 Does nothing to intrude into anybody's private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest

7 Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work

8 Resists threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge

9 Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person's age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation

10 Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed

11 A journalist shall normally seek the consent of an appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child for a story about her/his welfare

12 Avoids plagiarism The NUJ believes a journalist has the right to refuse an assignment or be identified as the author of editorial that would break the letter or spirit of the code.

The NUJ will fully support any journalist disciplined for asserting her/his right to act according to the code

The NUJ logo is always a link to the home page.

(As modified at Delegate Meeting 2011)

PBROTRIB CHARTER


Rights Holder Charter
Version: January 2009 v.3
Introduction
This Rights Holder Charter (“Charter”) sets out the terms and conditions governing the relationship between Julian Bray, Park Farm Neighbourhood Watch blog entitled Peterborough Tribune (PBROTRIB) on the Blogger and other platforms, and an individual or company making a Contribution to PBROTRIB (“Rights Holder”). The purpose of this document is to ensure that the Charter terms are
incorporated into to all Contracts with each Rights Holder, so both parties areclear as to how PBROTRIB may use content. This Charter does not apply to content submitted:
· using a feature or interactive service that allows
the individual to upload to and display content on any of PBROTRIB websites
(including social sites), apps, WAP sites or any web address owned or operated
by PBROTRIB as may link to the terms accessible at
(User-Generated Content (“UGC”)); or
·
This Charter applies to all Rights Holder Contributions, except where the Rights Holder is already subject to a separate
written agreement with PBROTRIB in relation to Contributions, or where PBROTRIB
has agreed in writing to vary or amend the Charter due to exceptional circumstances. Formation of the Contract

By sending PBROTRIB a Contribution you are making
an offer to PBROTRIB to use the Contribution.’ PBROTRIB’s use of the
Contribution is acceptance of your offer and creates a Contract on the terms of this Charter. Submission of a Contribution by you is an acknowledgement that
you agree to the terms of this Charter. If you do not agree to the Charter you must email us as soon as possible to raise your objection and withdraw your
submitted Contribution, otherwise you will be deemed to have accepted the Charter terms.
Definitions
Contract: the agreement between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution incorporating this Charter and the Special Terms (where applicable);
Contribution: material (written, audio, visual, video or audiovisual) created by the Rights Holder and will be
classified as either Material You Send Us or Material We Request From You;
Credit: for Material You Send Us “© [insert name of Rights Holder and Year]”;
Publication: means one or more publications owned or operated by PBROTRIB. Licence: the licence granted by the Rights Holder to PBROTRIB
as set out in the Licence sections of this Charter;
Personal Data: has the same meaning as provided in section 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998;
Material You Send Us: a Contribution as set out under the Material You Send Us paragraph;
Material We Request From You: A Contribution as set out under the Material We Request From You paragraph; Rights Holder: name of the of the individual or company which has created the relevant Contribution; Special Terms: written terms between PBROTRIB and the Rights Holder relating to the Contribution that are not set out in this Charter and/or vary this Charter; and User-Generated Content: content submitted by an individual through a feature that allows the individual to upload material to any of PBROTRIB websites or social sites.
Conflict with other Agreements: If there is any inconsistency between any of the provisions of this Charter and the Special Terms, the Special Terms shall prevail. To be clear, where no Special Terms are agreed in writing, the Charter will apply without variation. Sending us a Contribution –
The information Rights Holders please provide To PBROTRIB When sending us a Contribution, please provide the following information:
·
Your Full Name;
Your Full Address; and Your Contact Telephone Number and Email Address.

We will not be able to provide Credits where a
Rights Holder has not provided the relevant information.

Material You Send Us

Material You Send Us is a Contribution that is
received by PBROTRIB from a Rights Holder. The Contribution may be solicited or unsolicited. The following are examples of Material You Send Us:
PBROTRIB has seen the Rights Holders’ photograph on a third party website. PBROTRIB contacts the
Rights Holder and asks to use the photograph. (Solicited). A Rights Holder speculatively submits a range of photographs to and for PBROTRIB’s use. The Editor may or may not decide to use one or more of the photographs. (Unsolicited) Material You Send Us does not include UGC, Material We Request You To Send Us or material that is governed under any
other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to accept any Material You Send Us for review and if accepted for review is under no obligation to offer a Contract. Should PBROTRIB decide that it wishes to use the Contribution, it will be governed by the terms of this Charter. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. If you wish to submit a speculative Contribution to us, please
contact the appropriate PBROTRIB title. Please note that PBROTRIB will not be able to acknowledge receipt of your Contribution and any submission is at the Rights Holder’s own risk.
Material You Send Us – Licence Terms
PBROTRIB believes that Material You Send Us is the
Rights Holder’s property and that the Rights Holder should not need to give up all its rights for the Contribution to be used by PBROTRIB. Therefore, by
sending us a Contribution, the Rights Holder grants the following irrevocable licence in perpetuity to PBROTRIB: The right to publish, reproduce, licence and sell the Contribution as part of the Publication throughout the world in the following formats:
-- the physical printed Publication;
-- in a replica layout in any electronic format of
the Publication;
-- on the website version of the Publication;
-- in any PBROTRIB apps delivering the Publication
to a reader; and
-- on any PBROTRIB social media pages.
-- The right to publish extracts or the whole of
the Publication (which may or may not include the Contribution) when promoting PBROTRIB’s business or subscriptions in media advertisement, show cards and other promotional aids. The Right to authorise The Newspaper Licensing Agency and similar reprographic rights organisations in other jurisdictions (“RROs”) to distribute or license the distribution of your Contribution throughout the world in any language(s) for RROs’ licensed acts and purposes as amended from time to time, and to keep available your Contribution through such RROs. The unlimited right to amend, edit, select, crop, retouch, add to or delete any part of the Contribution, in any format, whether electronic or otherwise, including the right to remove or amend any meta data associated with the Contribution.

The right to store the Contribution electronically.
In return for the licence granted in relation to the Material You Send Us, PBROTRIB will endeavour to provide the Credit with the Contribution. The licence granted to PBROTRIB shall survive any termination of the agreement between PBROTRIB and the
Rights Holder. Material We Request From You
Material We Request From You is a Contribution that
has specifically commissioned by PBROTRIB. PBROTRIB will contact a Rights Holder and
commission them to provide a Contribution in relation to a brief. An example of Material We Request From You is: PBROTRIB needs a photograph of a country building. PBROTRIB instructs the Rights Holder to attend the venue and take picture of the building. Material We Request From You does not include UGC, Material You Send Us or material that is governed under any other relationship between the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB . The Rights Holder will provide its own equipment and materials to fulfil its obligation for Material We Request From You. PBROTRIB is under no obligation to use the Contribution. Material We Request From You –
Assignment and Licence
PBROTRIB believes that Material We Request From You should be PBROTRIB ’s property as PBROTRIB has requested the Rights Holder’s services and instructed them to create the Contribution on its behalf. However, PBROTRIB acknowledges that the Right Holder may need a licence from PBROTRIB to
use the Contribution for limited purposes. Therefore, in submitting Material We Request From You to PBROTRIB , the Rights Holder assigns to PBROTRIB with full title, right and interest all existing and future intellectual property rights in the Contribution. In return, PBROTRIB will endeavour to give a Credit to the Rights Holder and PBROTRIB grants the Rights Holder a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence to use the Contribution in its own online and offline portfolio, provided that the following copyright notice is applied to the Contribution “©Peterborough
Tribune, used under limited licence”.
General notes about Rights: Any rights granted to PBROTRIB or the Rights Holder under this Charter shall survive termination of the Contract for any reason. Rights Holder Promises The Rights Holder promises: that it owns the Contribution and / or is (and will continue to be) authorised to grant the rights to PBROTRIB; nothing in the Contribution is blasphemous, discriminatory, defamatory, untrue, misleading or unlawful; that the Contribution complies with the NUJ Code of Professional Conduct and the Independent
Press Standards Organisations Editors’ regulations and Code of Practice; the Contribution does not contain any virus, Trojan horse, hidden computer software or similar; the Contribution does not infringe the intellectual property rights of any third party; where the Contribution contains Personal Data, all
the necessary consents in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998 have been obtained; where the Contribution contains images of children under the age of 16, written parental consent has been obtained and can be provided on request; and maintain and comply with, at all times, the highest ethical standards in the preparation, creation and delivery of the Contribution.
Complaints In the event that a complaint is raised in relation to a Contribution, the Rights Holder agrees to co-operate fully with any internal or external investigation or process. Status. The Rights Holder is an independent contractor and nothing in the Charter shall render the Rights Holder an employee, worker,
agent or partner of PBROTRIB. The Rights Holder is responsible for any taxes/national insurance payable in relation to any services provided under the Charter.
Indemnity The Rights Holder shall keep PBROTRIB indemnified in full against all loss incurred or paid by PBROTRIB as a result of or in connection with any claim made against PBROTRIB by a third party:
arising out of, or in connection with the Contribution, to the extent that such claim arises out of the breach of this or any terms of this Charter (including any Special Terms); and for actual or alleged infringement of a third party's intellectual property rights arising out of, or in connection with the use of the Contribution except in so far as the claim arises as a result of changes made by PBROTRIB or a breach of the Licence by PBROTRIB.
Variation of the Charter No variation of any term of this Charter will be effective, unless it is set out in writing (letter, fax or email) and signed by
a relevant authorised representative of PBROTRIB. If you wish to submit a Contribution and are unable to agree with the terms of this Charter or if you
have any questions regarding this Charter, please contact a relevant authorised representative of the PBROTRIB publication.
Problems & Disputes In the event of a problem or dispute in relation to a Licence and/or in connection with this Charter, in the first instance the Rights Holder and the Editor will look to resolve the dispute amicably. Application of the Charter Unless otherwise agreed, this Charter shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and English courts will have exclusive jurisdiction